This thread is getting retarded!!
By saying the preferred method of tuning is with a flowbench for MAF transfer?Eric, can you outline the post where 91svtbird was trying to drum up any business at all, or where HE SAID PEOPLE SHOULD GO, I must have missed it. The guy is trying to help the membership:bash::mj::bash:
For those that really want to help the community, how about some of these questions?
1. Is your tuner using lab grade equipment or is he using a $300 budget wideband?
2. Is the location your tuner is placing the wideband giving you accurate information? If its in the tailpipe, think about this. How many leaks are there in front of that wideband? Fueling is pretty much a time based thing. You have to tell the pcm when you move the o2 downstream with longtubes because there is a time shift present. What is the timeshift back to the sniffer?
For those that really want to help the community, how about some of these questions?
1. Is your tuner using lab grade equipment or is he using a $300 budget wideband?
2. Is the location your tuner is placing the wideband giving you accurate information? If its in the tailpipe, think about this. How many leaks are there in front of that wideband? Fueling is pretty much a time based thing. You have to tell the pcm when you move the o2 downstream with longtubes because there is a time shift present. What is the timeshift back to the sniffer?
Eric,
Mean no disrespect ? You saying something about post I didn't even write.
Yes I was interviewed for tech info and quoted but this is not my post.
Then you bring up a Throttle body that I haven't been involved with for 2 years making misleading statements.
I sold my shop 6 years ago and don't tune for the public.
If anybody is trying to drum up business here it might be you....
Trying talk to down facts about the preferred tuning method in favor of things you do which are less than optimal.
I’ll end it here since I see personal attacks.
Sorry you don’t like Ford’s preferred tuning methods.
Have a nice day.
I did in fact state right in the beginning of my article why I put this article together. This article was originally posted in the13’ Gt500 section because of all the tuning issues that members have expressed regarding their cars. It was moved here by the moderator. In case you missed it here is a direct quote below of my reason for writing it in the first place. I can’t say I’m surprised by your reaction to this article but my concern is for the community as a whole not those making money off them.
Quote:
“My reason for posting this information is my concern for the unsuspecting Mustang community, to hopefully educate because of what I see happening with member’s cars with aftermarket tunes.”
Someone sent this thread to me - Warning !! Before you change that tune read this!
Same agenda as this thread.
Someone sent this thread to me - Warning !! Before you change that tune read this!
Same agenda as this thread.
Here's the same thread, but with replies from some people in this thread...
Warning !! Before you change that tune read this!!
91svtbird said:Tob it’s unfortunate for the members in the 13’GT500 section that you moved my article “ The Foundation of Mass Air Calibration” out of the 2013 GT500 section...if you think it should be posted in the ‘a-la-cart tuning section also but no way should it be hidden from view in the 13’ section. I thought this site is all about making available good helpful information about the cars to the membership. By removing this thread from this forum I believe you have done a disservice to the members who frequent this forum looking for important information that could help them.