Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Donut Shop
Lost some respect for the 5-0
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CobraRed01" data-source="post: 11301056" data-attributes="member: 11346"><p>I guess you can get all "PC" about PC, but in this case the officer was looking for bigger fish to fry and certainly never intended to write the OP for the bogus rolling stop. So... the OP wouldn't be inclined to complain since other than a temporary hassle no damage was done. I would give the police some latitude based on reasonable suspicion. My guess is he construed the barely longer stop by the OP as suspicious...as if a driver with nefarious intent stopped suddenly saw the LEO and paused to decide what to do next. Yeah, a bit of a stretch, but probably not to a vigilent officer on the beat in a rough neighborhood between 1 and 5 am. </p><p></p><p>I am all up for legal restraints on LE to protect our constitutional rights...but a certain amount of working latitude is required. This case was a no-biggie. Having lived in Newark, NJ for much of my "formative" life I have seen my share of check stops (chalk it up to too much youth and too much party at the time) and reasonable police suspicion, but my friends and I never had a problem with it. Nothing, but respect for the police.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CobraRed01, post: 11301056, member: 11346"] I guess you can get all "PC" about PC, but in this case the officer was looking for bigger fish to fry and certainly never intended to write the OP for the bogus rolling stop. So... the OP wouldn't be inclined to complain since other than a temporary hassle no damage was done. I would give the police some latitude based on reasonable suspicion. My guess is he construed the barely longer stop by the OP as suspicious...as if a driver with nefarious intent stopped suddenly saw the LEO and paused to decide what to do next. Yeah, a bit of a stretch, but probably not to a vigilent officer on the beat in a rough neighborhood between 1 and 5 am. I am all up for legal restraints on LE to protect our constitutional rights...but a certain amount of working latitude is required. This case was a no-biggie. Having lived in Newark, NJ for much of my "formative" life I have seen my share of check stops (chalk it up to too much youth and too much party at the time) and reasonable police suspicion, but my friends and I never had a problem with it. Nothing, but respect for the police. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Donut Shop
Lost some respect for the 5-0
Top