Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Donut Shop
Lost some respect for the 5-0
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mach1USMC" data-source="post: 11302280" data-attributes="member: 42788"><p>Alrighty then!!.... I bow to your superior knowledge!!:beer:</p><p></p><p>Although THIS caught my eye- under this "Rule" involving vehicles what is reasonable? Is the mere fact that you are driving in a neighborhood considered reasonable suspicion?"..... is there any case law where someone has fought this and won? Just curious to see if and what the "Paul Harvey" is on this!!</p><p></p><p>To me "Reasonable Suspicion" would be: violating a traffic law, stopping by a specific known drug house, Stopping and passing something or accepting something from someone on the street. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Reasonable suspicion to ME is not driving a nice car in a bad neighborhood while obeying ALL traffic laws late at night or early in the morning. It just doesn't pass the "smell test" for me. Sorry </p><p></p><p>THE “ROLLING” TERRY STOP</p><p>Law enforcement officers should remember </p><p>that, just as a person may be subjected to a </p><p>lawful Terry stop while walking down the </p><p>street, so too can a moving auto be pulled over </p><p>(forcibly - via use of emergency lights and </p><p>siren) if valid <em><u> reasonable suspicion</u></em> exists to </p><p>support the stop.</p><p>3</p><p> Both uniformed and plainclothes personnel can employ this concept.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mach1USMC, post: 11302280, member: 42788"] Alrighty then!!.... I bow to your superior knowledge!!:beer: Although THIS caught my eye- under this "Rule" involving vehicles what is reasonable? Is the mere fact that you are driving in a neighborhood considered reasonable suspicion?"..... is there any case law where someone has fought this and won? Just curious to see if and what the "Paul Harvey" is on this!! To me "Reasonable Suspicion" would be: violating a traffic law, stopping by a specific known drug house, Stopping and passing something or accepting something from someone on the street. Reasonable suspicion to ME is not driving a nice car in a bad neighborhood while obeying ALL traffic laws late at night or early in the morning. It just doesn't pass the "smell test" for me. Sorry THE “ROLLING” TERRY STOP Law enforcement officers should remember that, just as a person may be subjected to a lawful Terry stop while walking down the street, so too can a moving auto be pulled over (forcibly - via use of emergency lights and siren) if valid [I][U] reasonable suspicion[/U][/I] exists to support the stop. 3 Both uniformed and plainclothes personnel can employ this concept. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Donut Shop
Lost some respect for the 5-0
Top