Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Mustang Forums
2015+ S550 Mustangs
S550 Mustang Suspension Modification/Discussion
LOWERING" Anyone Notice The Odd Stance On Most Lowered S550's
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ry_Trapp0" data-source="post: 14832660" data-attributes="member: 27761"><p>me thinks some people don't realize how large of a difference there is between the measurements of the front and rear wheel gap vs comparing the angle of the rocker panel to the ground. the yellow car above, for example has a pretty damn heavy rake, regardless of what the fender gaps are telling you. i've thrown some lines on the shot to really show how heavy the rake actually is...</p><p></p><p style="text-align: center"><img src="http://upurs.us/image/65084.png" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p><p></p><p>...the 2 verticle lines represent the body rake to tire contact patch(or, level ground) separation taken at the very front and very rear edges of the car. now, that image exaggerates how steep the rake is because we're essentially looking down at the rocker panel - a true visualization would be a picture taken level with the center of the rocker panel(if the center of the rocker panel is 3" of the ground, then the camera should be ~3" off the ground, ideally taking into account the radius of the lens). but, this not-100%-accurate pic gets the point across none the less.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ry_Trapp0, post: 14832660, member: 27761"] me thinks some people don't realize how large of a difference there is between the measurements of the front and rear wheel gap vs comparing the angle of the rocker panel to the ground. the yellow car above, for example has a pretty damn heavy rake, regardless of what the fender gaps are telling you. i've thrown some lines on the shot to really show how heavy the rake actually is... [center][img]http://upurs.us/image/65084.png[/img][/center] ...the 2 verticle lines represent the body rake to tire contact patch(or, level ground) separation taken at the very front and very rear edges of the car. now, that image exaggerates how steep the rake is because we're essentially looking down at the rocker panel - a true visualization would be a picture taken level with the center of the rocker panel(if the center of the rocker panel is 3" of the ground, then the camera should be ~3" off the ground, ideally taking into account the radius of the lens). but, this not-100%-accurate pic gets the point across none the less. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Mustang Forums
2015+ S550 Mustangs
S550 Mustang Suspension Modification/Discussion
LOWERING" Anyone Notice The Odd Stance On Most Lowered S550's
Top