Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Cobra Forums
2015+ Shelby GT350 Mustang
No ADM
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Beernuts" data-source="post: 15127344" data-attributes="member: 134843"><p>I disagree. I have proof of multiple examples of collusion exactly as described on the DOJ website including:</p><p></p><p>-Prices previously were different. </p><p></p><p>-Price increases do not appear to be supported by increased costs. </p><p></p><p>-Bid or price documents contain white-outs or other physical alterations indicating last-minute price changes.</p><p></p><p>-Any reference to industry-wide or association price schedules.</p><p></p><p>-Any statement indicating advance (non-public) knowledge of competitors' pricing.</p><p></p><p>-Any statement indicating that vendors have discussed prices among themselves or have reached an understanding about prices.</p><p></p><p>-where price increases are announced by all competitors at the same time, or prior to a uniform effective date, there is a substantial likelihood of collusion.</p><p></p><p>-evidence of competitors' meetings or telephone conversations raise the possibility of collusion, and such evidence usually comprises the most effective circumstantial form of proof in price-fixing cases</p><p></p><p>-The agreement need not be embodied in express or formal contractual statements. It must merely constitute some form of mutual understanding that the parties will combine their efforts for a common, unlawful purpose. The ultimate success of the venture is immaterial as long as the agreement is in fact formed.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Beernuts, post: 15127344, member: 134843"] I disagree. I have proof of multiple examples of collusion exactly as described on the DOJ website including: -Prices previously were different. -Price increases do not appear to be supported by increased costs. -Bid or price documents contain white-outs or other physical alterations indicating last-minute price changes. -Any reference to industry-wide or association price schedules. -Any statement indicating advance (non-public) knowledge of competitors' pricing. -Any statement indicating that vendors have discussed prices among themselves or have reached an understanding about prices. -where price increases are announced by all competitors at the same time, or prior to a uniform effective date, there is a substantial likelihood of collusion. -evidence of competitors' meetings or telephone conversations raise the possibility of collusion, and such evidence usually comprises the most effective circumstantial form of proof in price-fixing cases -The agreement need not be embodied in express or formal contractual statements. It must merely constitute some form of mutual understanding that the parties will combine their efforts for a common, unlawful purpose. The ultimate success of the venture is immaterial as long as the agreement is in fact formed. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Cobra Forums
2015+ Shelby GT350 Mustang
No ADM
Top