Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Articles and News
Front Page Articles
No Replacement for Displacement | Is it Time for a 5.7L Tall-Deck Coyote???
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SID297" data-source="post: 16080611" data-attributes="member: 8858"><p>Funny you mention the diesel thing. I've blown the CAC tube off a 6.4 Powerstroke towing trailer. It was a struggle to make it a few miles on flat ground and keep the EGTs from going through the roof.</p><p></p><p>Every engine Ford uses in the F-150 is a 4V. Variable cam timing and intake design has basically removed low-rpm cylinder filling issues.</p><p></p><p>The 6.2 is dead. Sadly, it looks like that architecture is going away. Though some of the basic dimensions may live on in the 7.3L Godzilla engine. </p><p></p><p>As for cost, a tall-deck Coyote would be relatively inexpensive. Most of the engineering has either been done, or done in a similar fashion before. The real costs would be lost production efficiencies parts not hared between the 5.0 and 5.7. </p><p></p><p>I don't think any manufacturer considers cost to rebuild in a fleet situation. They would all rather you buy a new truck.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SID297, post: 16080611, member: 8858"] Funny you mention the diesel thing. I've blown the CAC tube off a 6.4 Powerstroke towing trailer. It was a struggle to make it a few miles on flat ground and keep the EGTs from going through the roof. Every engine Ford uses in the F-150 is a 4V. Variable cam timing and intake design has basically removed low-rpm cylinder filling issues. The 6.2 is dead. Sadly, it looks like that architecture is going away. Though some of the basic dimensions may live on in the 7.3L Godzilla engine. As for cost, a tall-deck Coyote would be relatively inexpensive. Most of the engineering has either been done, or done in a similar fashion before. The real costs would be lost production efficiencies parts not hared between the 5.0 and 5.7. I don't think any manufacturer considers cost to rebuild in a fleet situation. They would all rather you buy a new truck. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Articles and News
Front Page Articles
No Replacement for Displacement | Is it Time for a 5.7L Tall-Deck Coyote???
Top