Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Special Interests and Events
Open Track Racing
SCCA Track Night in America. Advice and recommendations please
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MFE" data-source="post: 15273216" data-attributes="member: 36397"><p>I prefer my multi-viscosities to have closer numbers; the closer they are, the less they rely on viscosity enhancers to close the gap. Car companies like low w's for fleet fuel economy, not track use. I'd run at least 10/40 or 15/50 for track days. People look at those numbers and freak out like they're sludge, the fact is at mild temps, they're not that different, but at track temps? Big difference.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MFE, post: 15273216, member: 36397"] I prefer my multi-viscosities to have closer numbers; the closer they are, the less they rely on viscosity enhancers to close the gap. Car companies like low w's for fleet fuel economy, not track use. I'd run at least 10/40 or 15/50 for track days. People look at those numbers and freak out like they're sludge, the fact is at mild temps, they're not that different, but at track temps? Big difference. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Special Interests and Events
Open Track Racing
SCCA Track Night in America. Advice and recommendations please
Top