Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Kill Drive-Thru
Terminator VS 2010 SS Camaro
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MGC" data-source="post: 9202738" data-attributes="member: 90908"><p>I'll disregard the motor comment. </p><p></p><p>1. you CAN get belt slip with a 3.1 pulley, but I heard wheel hop and clutch slippage.</p><p></p><p>2. I saw no traffic at all :shrug: it was clear the cobra was pulling on it</p><p></p><p>3 . "Chevy's Camaro SS outfitted with the 422-hp 6.2-liter LS3 V8 six-speed manual hits 60 mph in 4.9 seconds and runs a 13.4-second quarter-mile at 108 mph according to Oppenheiser. Strangely enough, Oppenheiser also claims that the automatic-equipped SS Camaro, which is rated at 400 hp, runs from zero to 60 mph in just 4.6 seconds and through the quarter-mile in 13.3 seconds. "We optimized the shift points," he said." </p><p><a href="http://www.insideline.com/chevrolet/camaro/2010/2010-chevy-camaro-ss-0-60-in-46-seconds.html" target="_blank">http://www.insideline.com/chevrolet/camaro/2010/2010-chevy-camaro-ss-0-60-in-46-seconds.html</a></p><p>It's actually not that big of a difference. </p><p></p><p>4. What if what if.... what if the cobra's clutch wasn't slipping and it didn't have wheelhop <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite7" alt=":p" title="Stick Out Tongue :p" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":p" />oke:</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MGC, post: 9202738, member: 90908"] I'll disregard the motor comment. 1. you CAN get belt slip with a 3.1 pulley, but I heard wheel hop and clutch slippage. 2. I saw no traffic at all :shrug: it was clear the cobra was pulling on it 3 . "Chevy's Camaro SS outfitted with the 422-hp 6.2-liter LS3 V8 six-speed manual hits 60 mph in 4.9 seconds and runs a 13.4-second quarter-mile at 108 mph according to Oppenheiser. Strangely enough, Oppenheiser also claims that the automatic-equipped SS Camaro, which is rated at 400 hp, runs from zero to 60 mph in just 4.6 seconds and through the quarter-mile in 13.3 seconds. "We optimized the shift points," he said." [url]http://www.insideline.com/chevrolet/camaro/2010/2010-chevy-camaro-ss-0-60-in-46-seconds.html[/url] It's actually not that big of a difference. 4. What if what if.... what if the cobra's clutch wasn't slipping and it didn't have wheelhop :poke: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Kill Drive-Thru
Terminator VS 2010 SS Camaro
Top