This was the first thing that came to mind for me also.I'm surprised the no attorney is trying to make out a claim of Munchausen syndrome by proxy in a case like this.
This was the first thing that came to mind for me also.I'm surprised the no attorney is trying to make out a claim of Munchausen syndrome by proxy in a case like this.
Such as?
1. mom is pretending her son is a girl
2. boy is aware he is boy
3. dad is desperately trying to save his son's life
4. court tells dad to cram it
5. shitstorm from millions of pissed off americans gets attention on the subject
6. judge caves and says dad has a say
7. batshit crazy mom now getting looked at by the texas attorney general.
I think we know enough. these psychos need to shove off and leave the kids alone.
Have you ever been to court? Jurors are easily manipulated.11 of 12 jurors voted for. These are people like you and me representative of 92% of all americans. No sane person would agree to this much less 92% of the population. Common sense would dictate there is ALOT more to the story that we are not getting.
Just like the innocent 76 yr old man that was murdered by 6 men whom overheard him admit to having sex with a 10 year old. Theres a LOT more that we are not getting.
With enough public pressure, the medical board and CPS might be swayed to launch into an investigation.Too bad the mother can not be investigated because her judgement seems off.
11 of 12 jurors voted for. These are people like you and me representative of 92% of all americans. No sane person would agree to this much less 92% of the population. Common sense would dictate there is ALOT more to the story that we are not getting.
With all the negative press and probable death threats you'd think they would offer up some explanation from their side at this point.I dont understand what your trying to do? We both agree its not right no need in trying to convince me to see what I already see.
But again that is all your assumption based on half the story. You dont know ANY of the reasoning behind any of this. Perhaps this child was born with a genetic mutation and doesnt even have a
penis? You dont know. I dont make assumptions I listen to both sides. Until the mother, the doctor, the lawyer, judge and 11 of 12 jurors say how they concluded this childs life would best be suited as transgender how you or I feel about the situation is irrelevant.
It seems to me your passing judgement with out having the all details. I cant do that.
I dont understand what your trying to do? We both agree its not right no need in trying to convince me to see what I already see.
But again that is all your assumption based on half the story. You dont know ANY of the reasoning behind any of this. Perhaps this child was born with a genetic mutation and doesnt even have a
penis? You dont know. I dont make assumptions I listen to both sides. Until the mother, the doctor, the lawyer, judge and 11 of 12 jurors say how they concluded this childs life would best be suited as transgender how you or I feel about the situation is irrelevant.
It seems to me your passing judgement with out having the all details. I cant do that.
I dont understand what your trying to do? We both agree its not right no need in trying to convince me to see what I already see.
But again that is all your assumption based on half the story. You dont know ANY of the reasoning behind any of this. Perhaps this child was born with a genetic mutation and doesnt even have a
penis? You dont know. I dont make assumptions I listen to both sides. Until the mother, the doctor, the lawyer, judge and 11 of 12 jurors say how they concluded this childs life would best be suited as transgender how you or I feel about the situation is irrelevant.
It seems to me your passing judgement with out having the all details. I cant do that.
It depends on how liberal an area the jury pool was selected from. The country is full of sick ****s, that doesn't mean that I have to go along with it.I dont understand what your trying to do? We both agree its not right no need in trying to convince me to see what I already see.
But again that is all your assumption based on half the story. You dont know ANY of the reasoning behind any of this. Perhaps this child was born with a genetic mutation and doesnt even have a
penis? You dont know. I dont make assumptions I listen to both sides. Until the mother, the doctor, the lawyer, judge and 11 of 12 jurors say how they concluded this childs life would best be suited as transgender how you or I feel about the situation is irrelevant.
It seems to me your passing judgement with out having the all details. I cant do that.
Perhaps this child was born with a genetic mutation and doesnt even have a
penis?
x2 I understand that and I recall of a similar type case as well. It seems so far we all agree as no one in this thread has said any differently.
So again Im going to reiterate for all of us to be the minority here there has to be ALOT we are not getting of the story.
It seems to me your passing judgement with out having the all details. I cant do that.
So again Im going to reiterate for all of us to be the minority here there has to be ALOT we are not getting of the story.
Has nothing to do with god, us non religeous people find it equally disturbing. I dont know one single person who agrees with it and ive even talked to a couple Seattle liberals about it.you keep saying that while the rest of us keep telling you its the same progressive bullshit held by people who hate God, Texas, america, and children. keep giving them inches while they take miles.
my advice to you is to start treating the enemy with skepticism. we've long since passed the time for the benefit of the doubt.
You've already passed judgment. You're just looking for a reason to support this nonsense, and passing it off as "waiting for all the details".
you keep saying that while the rest of us keep telling you its the same progressive bullshit held by people who hate God, Texas, america, and children. keep giving them inches while they take miles.
my advice to you is to start treating the enemy with skepticism. we've long since passed the time for the benefit of the doubt.