Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Mustang Forums
SN-95 and New Edge Mustangs
The best H/C/I setup for 5.0s???
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pro SNIVELER" data-source="post: 9088274" data-attributes="member: 34027"><p>the reason for 87-93 being more desireable is the a9l EEC. the 94-95's have a different eec that is not nearly as adaptive to mods as the a9l/a9p's. once you swap out the cam and heads, youre prob going to need a dyno to get it right. bigger heads will need rpm's, which will also have to be tuned around in the eec or youll be stuck with 6300 iirc with the stock rev limiter. ive seen a few people with issues running afr's over the past 6mos, shitty valve guides/ locks and valve failure/dropping. trick flow has a new 190FAC head out which is a decent head, and has room to grow if you decide on a stroker later on. brodix, dart, edelbrock's estreet line are heads to look into, dont waste your money buying anything other than aluminum when it comes to heads otherwise youre just wasting money. you can buy used ones for well under $1000 everyday on most any mustang forum. jay allen, ed curtis, or buddy rawls are all decent places to shop for a cam. look them up on corral.net. </p><p></p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.mustang50magazine.com/featuredvehicles/m5lp_0412_1992_ford_mustang_lx/index.html" target="_blank">1992 Ford Mustang LX - Mustang 5.0 Magazine</a></p><p></p><p>cheaper, and faster....</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pro SNIVELER, post: 9088274, member: 34027"] the reason for 87-93 being more desireable is the a9l EEC. the 94-95's have a different eec that is not nearly as adaptive to mods as the a9l/a9p's. once you swap out the cam and heads, youre prob going to need a dyno to get it right. bigger heads will need rpm's, which will also have to be tuned around in the eec or youll be stuck with 6300 iirc with the stock rev limiter. ive seen a few people with issues running afr's over the past 6mos, shitty valve guides/ locks and valve failure/dropping. trick flow has a new 190FAC head out which is a decent head, and has room to grow if you decide on a stroker later on. brodix, dart, edelbrock's estreet line are heads to look into, dont waste your money buying anything other than aluminum when it comes to heads otherwise youre just wasting money. you can buy used ones for well under $1000 everyday on most any mustang forum. jay allen, ed curtis, or buddy rawls are all decent places to shop for a cam. look them up on corral.net. [url=http://www.mustang50magazine.com/featuredvehicles/m5lp_0412_1992_ford_mustang_lx/index.html]1992 Ford Mustang LX - Mustang 5.0 Magazine[/url] cheaper, and faster.... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Mustang Forums
SN-95 and New Edge Mustangs
The best H/C/I setup for 5.0s???
Top