Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Cobra Forums
2013-14 Shelby GT500
Thinking About Monoblade
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Catmonkey" data-source="post: 15544743" data-attributes="member: 124025"><p>Let's assume the 300 cfm difference. If we take the area of the 65mm CJ twin and 72mm twin jet, the larger throttle body would have about 24% greater area, less the throttle shaft areas. If the SCJ mono is said to flow 1,797 cfm, that would mean the 65mm CJ twin would flow 1,497 cfm, or thereabouts. So if the that 1.24 difference is applied to 1,497, you'd get 1,826. I wouldn't say that's appreciable. I'd say it's head to head.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Catmonkey, post: 15544743, member: 124025"] Let's assume the 300 cfm difference. If we take the area of the 65mm CJ twin and 72mm twin jet, the larger throttle body would have about 24% greater area, less the throttle shaft areas. If the SCJ mono is said to flow 1,797 cfm, that would mean the 65mm CJ twin would flow 1,497 cfm, or thereabouts. So if the that 1.24 difference is applied to 1,497, you'd get 1,826. I wouldn't say that's appreciable. I'd say it's head to head. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Cobra Forums
2013-14 Shelby GT500
Thinking About Monoblade
Top