Wrong.
This is the GT350R being tested by road and track
It was put through its paces last week
So? :shrug: It still wasn't available anywhere near time enough for the M/T Best Driver's Car competition.
Wrong.
This is the GT350R being tested by road and track
It was put through its paces last week
So? :shrug: It still wasn't available anywhere near time enough for the M/T Best Driver's Car competition.
That certainly hasn't been my experience. My butt dyno tells me my car runs just as strong, if not a tad stronger, at altitude. It [PD blower] definitely doesn't fall off similar to a NA engined car. On the turbo waste gate arena; turbos might have more adjustability, but it's not wholly unique to turbos to be able to adjust boost as altitude climbs. When I'm driving up into the mountains, I can watch my boost gauge climb as the altitude increases. (It generally goes from 0psi to 3 or 4 psi.) And I'm talking about under a steady throttle, not gassing it. Not hurling any rocks your way, but I always find it curious why turbo guys seem to think turbos have a monopoly on boost control.
Anyway, let's not derail this thread. Turbo versus supercharger discussions almost always end up in the gutter.
So, the Zo6 got a DNF?
The C7 Z06 that got a "DNF" in the Motor Trend BDC testing was the same one that Car and Driver took off-track at VIR and crashed during their Lightning Lap testing. A MT associate editor verified this.
Basically, C&D patched the car up and sent it back to GM. In epic act of stupidity, GM rebuilt the crashed car and sent it off to MT a few weeks later, apparently not realizing that the intercooler pump was unplugged and the brake pads were "worn out". A CCB-equipped car won't have a set of "worn out" pads from routine testing or street use in this short of time period.
Whoever was responsible for this complete fail in making press fleet cars available for testing should be fired if they haven't already.
S.