zero to sixty times

[gordone]

I've searched and searched but can't find zero to sixty times for 2003 Cobra. Looked through the download brochure from svt.ford.com. Couldn't find it there. Tried a search on svtperformance, no luck. I think I've seen it somewhere but, duhhh! Can't find it now.
Anybody?

 

[yermo]

i have seen 4.6-4.9 times in the various car magazines.

 

[mangrumm]

My 0-60 time was a 4.8 with tire spin. Fast auto.net has the 03 cobra doing 4.4 -4.5 seconds. I had my car rev up to around 3000 rpm when I did it.

 

[gordone]

Thanks. I was just looking at E55 AMG on the Mercedes site. They claim 4.5. 4.4 (!) - 4.9 is pretty respectable against a S/C 5.5 litre.

 

[MongoCobra]

my best is 4.47 using the G-Tech. I remember a 4.5 in car and driver when it first came out...

 

[jtfx6552]

With a G-tech, on DR's, on a decent track, mine are usually around 3.7-3.8

 

[Imperial Pose]

They claim 4.5

I like the AMG's a lot, a great combo of power, and luxury. I know we have to be careful with them. When I do run one, I don't plan on stopping at 60mph.

 

[NetworkingGuru]

3.8 is the best for me too, according to G-Tech. I have gotten a 3.2 once, but since I can't repeat it, I'm calling it a G-Tech screwup.

 

[stangfan]

Thanks. I was just looking at E55 AMG on the Mercedes site. They claim 4.5. 4.4 (!) - 4.9 is pretty respectable against a S/C 5.5 litre.

Man... I see one of these cars every day in the parking garage of my office (along with a GTS viper). I can't wait to get a chance to run either one of these guys! I ran the Viper about 6 months ago on a 0~60 sprint (when I was basically stock - CAI, weld-in mufflers) and it was pretty ugly.

Every day, I walk past both of these cars. One of these days, I'm going to 'grow a pair' and leave a not on both of there cars...

Wanna 'play' with an '03 Cobra

 

[Orange Poison]

Are those G-tech accurate.....do any of you guys take 'em to the track and see if the actual times match the G-tech times?

 

[coleman]

4.32, but that was a while ago ... i'm sure it's worse now

btw, i had no problem with a viper gts the other morning from a 40 mph roll. it was very comforting to know that i'm faster than what i was *considering* to purchase for far, far less!

 

[maoun]

4.5 is what magazines report....i want mine to be 4.0

 

[RSXFMCJWR]

3.2-.3 on a regular basis.:thumbsup:

 

[jtfx6552]

Originally posted by Blue Poison
Are those G-tech accurate.....do any of you guys take 'em to the track and see if the actual times match the G-tech times?

Nope, not accurate. I calibrate, calibrate and calibrate, still usually off about .3-.5 on the 1/4 mile ET and about 5 MPH.

 

[NetworkingGuru]

Originally posted by Blue Poison
Are those G-tech accurate.....do any of you guys take 'em to the track and see if the actual times match the G-tech times?

I posted a big long thread about the accuracy of mine once. It's on here somewhere.

 

[JaketheSnake]

Originally posted by gordone
Thanks. I was just looking at E55 AMG on the Mercedes site. They claim 4.5. 4.4 (!) - 4.9 is pretty respectable against a S/C 5.5 litre.

that e55 is pretty damn stout, there is a video on the www.fuelslut.com, a orlando car club, that thing can run