I can understand why BP would attack Royal Purple for their style of advertising, but the claims RP made 15 years ago were not untrue. They just weren't telling you that those were the benefits of any true group IV PAO synthetic base stock, and Royal Purple wasn't the only one using it.
Now, where I do get bent is how they attacked Royal Purple for not having any engine lubricants that are API certified. If you recall, Royal Purple, Amsoil (top tier only), and Red Line all use true group IV and V synthetic base stocks. Please read the quote below to understand WHY they are not certified. It's not that they can't pass, it's because the API makes the certifications biased towards petroleum base stocks and prejudice against true synthetic base stocks.
Please also note:
Amsoil DOES have engine lubricants that are API, ISLAC, and Dexos certified. You will find that in their XL and OE line of lubricants. Want to know why they are certified, because they are formulated with cheaper group III "hydrocracked" petroleum base stocks.
Interesting, isn't it. Things that make you go...hmmmm! :read:
Any reason why I read a lot about RP shearing from UOA? It's in plenty of BITOG threads as well. :shrug: