Show us this proof
No offense but 12.59@107mph is a long ways from a 11 second slip. I do not see him running 11's with that trap speed either.
Heres directly off his avatar hes over on the stangnet.com forums,His names bryan, he has dyno sheets pictures time slips,videos,He has popped the hood for me several times, very honest nice kid, very nice car, and very nasty driver. and sounds like a exaust only 5.0 when started the motor / engine bay looks stock as can be, hes not hideing anything just a very good driver
1989 LX: Stock Heads (GT40 valves UNported)/Stock cam/Cobra Intake, Exhaust, 3.73s, lowered, 18" DD Bullitts.
BEST: Not necessarily the same passes.
SLICKS: ET: 12.56 MPH: 107.2
17" ET Streets: ET: 12.53 MPH: 108.5
17" DRs: ET: 12.87 MPH: 111.5
18" Radials: ET: 12.95 MPH: 109.2
Yes I personally kno him,He is friends with all the local mustang guys im friends with, like steven stated, he runs is cars with his dad and brother in factory stock class, him and his dad and brother are ALMOST PERFECT DRIVERS! this kid drives his 5 speed like its an automatic, he is very impressive to say the least, all of his cars run crazy times he pulls 1.4-1.5/1.6 60'' foots he drives the hell out of the car! and I can personally tell you nothing fishy about his car, ive seen it and he has exactly what mods listed still stock heads cam and motor , just very good free mods tweaks, bolt ons, no back seat, light fox slicks and he drives it like he stole it lol and very good tune on it making most power he can make out of his setup.
all it takes is 200rwhp in a light car n/a to break in the 12's with traction tire/ gears and a nasty driver behind the wheel hes pretty much the 5.0 version of what import guys do with k20's in a gutted honda crx lol doesnt take much when u have perfect traction , he would even prob destory me and I MAKE about 100 more rwhp then him being i prob cant cut better than a 2.0 60 ft.
Hes living proof mustangs can to have power to weight dont need alot of power and built motors or turbos ect, his 1st goal was to prove you can get a stock motor 5.0 deep in 12's he proved everyone wrong that said it cant be done, now he wants to get in the 11's to show people it can be done to. I guess his next goal is 4.10 gears, get more seat time and get the 60 foot down more hes hopeing for high 11's I hope to see it aswell always good to see guys set goals that people cant belive can be done
LOL at the biased quote summary. Notice you had nothing other to offer with your blantant lie though.
So whats up with no answer to the fact your TURBOCHARGED combo ran 11.4@121??? I thought it was an SN95 with factory LONGBLOCK N/A???? Now ITS H/C/I and a hairdryer? :shrug:
LET ME MAKE YOU MY BITCH REAL QUICKLIKE:
LS1TECH THREAD:
LS1TECH
No where did he say that it did so n/a. He was responding to a question.And last time at the track my 5.0 ran 11.4@121mph.
For a 302 to get into the 11s with a stock long-block, it would take a Cobra with full bolt-ons, weight reduction, and sticky tires
The best part about that car is that it isn't a gutted pile. I actually used to vote for that car @ the mustangs unlimited car show in manchester. That is one of my favorite LX's.
Not to threadjack but its not like this thread has delivered yet, anyway.
I still find it hard to believe it ran 111.5mph on ANY run but I've heard from some people that the kid can drive like noones business. :beer:
He was asked about his car. This is all he said: No where did he say that it did so n/a. He was responding to a question.
Here's a 10 second n/a fuel injected HR cammed 306. He went 11.96 with the stock shortblock. He's also done some super impressive stuff with a 347 (9.69@140) and his current 359 (9.59@142). All were n/a, FI, & HR cammed: Marc Arnold's 1993 Cobra
For a 302 to get into the 11s with a stock long-block, it would take a Cobra with full bolt-ons, weight reduction, and sticky tires, and it would do it at a higher raceweight than you listed. My own H/C/I '92 went [email protected] at a raceweight of ~3160 (2976 + 185lb driver). Mine dynod 311/330 SAE but that was before I went from an underhood K&N to an AFM powerpipe and also went from stock size catback w/ Flowmasters to a 2.5" catback and Dynomax super-turbo mufflers. I'm no pro, and my car had another 1-2 tenths in the driving. I think a bolt-on cobra could get there, but it would take time, practice, and patience.
Who cares about the stock long-block point, anyway. Stock E7s are junk and should be tossed in favor of after-market aluminum. 4v 4.6s come with great heads that I would not toss, though I might port 'em. Both cars can be surprisingly quick for just a little scratch.
Why all the bickering, though? Honestly, this thread turned into a comparison of stockish 13 second streeters to 11 second cars... Why?
Whatever platform you build, go fast with class. We're all mustang guys here:
4.6 owners ---->:beer:<----- 5.0 owners
Chris
And my stock longblock 5.0 should have zero problem getting into the 11's n/a. Bring your n/a 96-98 Cobra if you have one and we can compare our track times.
this particular cobra runs 9.2's on average
with a best of 8.8 i think?
in the 1/8th
if those are the times he is running than a simple bolt fox should easily be able to hang with him. My car ran a 9.2 with a terrible 60' (2.3) and it still has stock heads on it.
i dont think my car would have any problem outrunning a mild bolt-on cobra.
Again with bolt ons and the stock 3.08 gears I got my 5.0 to run 9.5 in the 1/8th. In a Fox LX with some 4.10 gears it should have no problem running 8.9 or better. With that said a 96-98 Cobra with 4.56 gears and bolt ons should have no problem running 8.6 or better in the 1/8th.
Races might get delayed again due to weather, this weekend were suppose to get freezing fog and sub 30 degree weather for a high.