anti roll...
sway keeps the suspension in check...anti roll keep the body straight when you launch.
Sorry. Next contestant.
Those are different terms for the SAME thing ...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-roll_bar
umm..your link...says they ARE the same thing..which essentially they are..but not..sway bar (also known as anti roll bar) wikipedia is garbage. they connect at different points which make the car react differently. you will have MUCH more body roll with a sway bar that usually attaches to the control arms and lets the body ride on the suspension and THEN use the sway bar. you will have less with the anti roll bar (wonder why its called that?) as its connected to the body and prevents any type of roll and uses minimal suspension travel.
Nice try. Next contestant.
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa4078/is_200402/ai_n9383456
:loser:
congrats..you know how to use google. I dont care what bnet says...have you tried a "sway bar" and then an "anti-roll bar" at the track? Im guessing not since your a google fanatic. I have...they are WORLDS different. but hey..I have no clue...I just drive a mid 10 sec eaton car.
sway bar = auto-x or street
anti-roll bar = drag racing
period.
BTW driving a 10-sec car does NOT qualify you as any kind of technical expert. It only makes you a strong contender for next year's Darwin Awards.
Here are a few relevent tech sections from the NHRA, NASA, and NMRA. None of them makes any distinction between anti-sway bars and anti-roll bars. Hey, but what do THEY know? After all, you drive a 10-sec car ...
From NASA Camaro-Mustang Challenge Official Rules …
8.36.13. The sway bar(s) may be removed or any OEM factory sway bar(s) may be updated/backdated within the years, make and model groups as follows:
1. 1982-92 Chevrolet Camaro (all submodels eq – RS, Z28, IROC, including 1LE)
2. 1993-2002 Chevrolet Camaro (all submodels eq – RS, Z28, SS etc)
3. 1979-2003 Ford Mustang (including Cobra and Saleen models
There is no mention of “anti-roll” bars, because NASA makes no distinction between “anti-sway” and “anti-roll” bars.
From NHRA Sport Compact Class Regulations …
SUSPENSION, REAR:
Strut tower braces, lower tie bars, sway bars, and limit straps are
permitted. Complete, operative OEM suspension mandatory. Bolton
traction devices permitted. Control arms, strut mounting points,
etc., must be OEM, front and rear. Aftermarket springs and struts,
including coil-overs, permitted, but must utilize original OEM
mounting points. Final decision rests with NHRA Technical
Services. Spindle mounts prohibited.
SUSPENSION, FRONT:
Upper mounting point for strut assemblies must be in the factory
location. Adjustable caster/camber pillowball mounts are permitted.
Lower control arm may be strengthened provided factory mounting
points to chassis are maintained. Lower mounting point for strut
assembly may be modified for improved caster or camber. Strut
tower braces, lower tie bars, sway bars, and limit straps are
permitted. Traction bars/devices permitted; must be bolt on ONLY.
Final decision rests with NHRA Technical Services.
There is no mention of “anti-roll” bars, because NHRA makes no distinction between “anti-sway” and “anti-roll” bars.
From NMRA General Rules and Procedures …
13-10.4 Sway bars to be mounted in stock location with all thread or stock mounts.
There is no mention of “anti-roll” bars, because NMRA makes no distinction between “anti-sway” and “anti-roll” bars.
The only places where the term “roll bar” can be found in any of the above documents is in reference to the tube structure that extends above the driver’s head as protection in the event of a rollover.
where did I say I was a tech expert? I said I have used both of them extensively and they are worlds different. one is used to keep the car from swaying left to right by being connected to the lower control arms. and the other keeps the car level being attached to the body. they serve different purposes. I guess me and Steeda and all of the other companies that manufacture anti-roll bars and sway bars are wrong. here look..I can google too
Anti-Roll bar
Definition: A suspension element (used at the front, the rear, or both ends of a car) that reduces body roll by resisting any unequal vertical motion between the pair of wheels to which it is connected. An anti-roll bar does not affect suspension stiffness when both wheels are deflected equally in the same direction. Often incorrectly called a sway bar.
SWAY BAR
Definition: A component that's often used in a suspension system to control body roll. A sway bar may be used on the front and/or rear suspension to help keep the body flat as the vehicle rounds a corner. This greatly improves a vehicle's cornering agility. Replacing the sway bar with one of a larger diameter can increase it even more.
they are made different, they are for different purposes, they work different....period.
First, those of us who actually made it through secondary school refer to the process of locating supporting documentation as "research," not "googling."
Second, I noticed that you didn't care to share any links to your "expert" references, which leaves both their integrity and their authority somewhat in question.
Third, your second "reference" seems to support MY position, rather than yours. Perhaps you should polish up your reading skills.
Fourth, why don't you go peddle your nonsense to all of the sanctioning bodies on this planet, since they don't share your opinion, either.
You're trying unsuccessfully to make a case for something that just aint so. Let it go.
Next contestant.
:kaboom:
not unsuccessfully..post #12 is fact. if you want to kill him or for him to crash his car he will listen to you and use a sway bar. he asked which is better for 1/4 mile...thats an anti-roll bar mounted to the body and axle. how much racing does that KB see?? :rollseyes
:lol:
Hahahaha!!! Dr. DOOM speaks! Hahahaha!!!!
What a maroon! Oh, and this KB sees plenty of track time, thank you very much.
:rollseyes
ooop...now the name calling starts. im not the one telling a drag racer to use a sway bar.
whats it run?
What it runs is irrelevant. This isn't about who's d1ck is bigger.
Anyway, you've just about pegged my Fun Meter, so I'm finished with this nonsense. Go ahead and get your last words in, Junior. Obviously you're determined to have the last say so have at it. There's already adequate OBJECTIVE evidence above to enable anyone to arrive at an informed conclusion regarding who's right and who's full of it.
Bye, now.