Nice kill ... those Z06's are no joke !
? Why the 4B11 rods cant handle high revs? You figure with ARP Rod bolts, as long as they dont stretch you dont have to worry about spinning a bearing. Unless Im missing something... I revved my IX on stock motor with just Cosworth M2's, GSC Beehives, meth @32psi, ARP Headstuds to 8500 with no issues.
It looks like 450 AWTQ and 8000 rpm are the limits of the stock rods.
Damn... And they make the 4B11 look so promising with that amazing flowing head! Didnt know the rods were that bad... Bump for built 4B11's! LMAO
Dan :cheers:
Well I dont know about bad. I am pretty impressed it can make over 500 whp and rev to 8k on a little factory 2L. ETS made high 700's with just some drop in pistons and rods with my turbo and E85.
2 questions
1) How do you brake boost while moving? I never understood this
2) Pics of evo?
Boost on a 4 cylinder is a lot different then boost on a 8. 20#'s on a 4 banger, would be probably half on a 8 cylinder, if not less.
Yes, but people are asking how do you run 30#s on pump gas. I agree on the fun factor. My son has a Cobalt SS turbo that spikes to 25-26#s and it is fun little car. Myself, my Z making 11#s on a 427 and 750-800rwhp is pretty damn fun too! :beer:Of course, v8's produce ALOT more cylinder pressure than 4 bangers. But Ill tell you this, 30psi on pump gas is ALOT of fun on a 4 banger! :rockon:
Dan :beer:
Well compare it the the 4G63 motors, it doesnt seem up to par. The head flows AMAZING on the 4B11's, where as you need to build and port the head of a 4G63 to get similar flow rates.
But when it comes to the bottom end, seems like the 4G63 stands superior to the 4B11 (IN STOCK FORM). We've already seen Mellon make over 600awhp on the stock bottom end, STM has gotten into the 9's with the stock bottom end.
FBI, ETS, and even DG Motors has been doing some nasty things with the X's tho. A local around here is making high 600's if Im not mistaken on a 6765. And its painted "Millenium Yellow", which is the same color as a 07 C6 vette.
Dan :beer:
I have to disagree. I think they are pretty close with a slight bump to the 4G. My understanding of the 4G63 is its safe limit is around 450 wtq also. Of course people's opinion of what is safe may vary. Both the 4g and 4B have been well into the 600's on the stock internals. It is borrowed time on both engines though. And mod for mod if the internals are the same the 4B makes more power than the 4G due to the bump in compression and better heads. That said if I wanted to build a 1000+ hp engine I would still go with the 4G just for the closed deck and iron block. It is yet to be seen if the 4B with its semi closed deck and aluminum block will or can survive at those power numbers.
Yes, but people are asking how do you run 30#s on pump gas. I agree on the fun factor. My son has a Cobalt SS turbo that spikes to 25-26#s and it is fun little car. Myself, my Z making 11#s on a 427 and 750-800rwhp is pretty damn fun too! :beer: