I agree but gender is irrelevant.The problem with the give whamen revolvers logic is that revolvers suck ass.
I do the same with semi autos. So do others with my semi autos.That heavy double action trigger is going to cause an in experienced shooter to pull right with their shots.
I seen the same thing at the shooting range last month when an entire class was doing their shooting portion of the CCW class. No one had revolvers. No one had nose heavy guns. The majority were inexperienced.They are nose heavy and will cause an inexperienced shooter to shot down.
I agree. However a burn is better than a "single shot" from a limp wrist/jam.An inexperienced shooter will potentially have fingers forward of the cylinder. Even a low power 38 can give a quick wincing burn which may cause them to drop the gun.
All guns inside our house will be loud. All pistols I have no matter the Barrel side will ring my eyes with no ear pro outside the home. I do dislike shooting very small guns.Hammers get caught on clothes. Cylinder timing can get jammed. A snub nose is loud and snappy and typically has shit sights.
I prefer shooting a heavier/larger gun over something light and small.Pound for pound they typically are heavier.
I agree.All this can be trained away but obviously that training could be better spent on a modern weapon like a Bodyguard, Shield, 43 or 365.
The person who I quoted did not mention conceal carry. With that said, I disagree. A revolver may be best for certain people. I agree a lot of the issues above can be fixed with training/practice.If you don't have the skills to fire a pistol you have no business carrying a revolver.
I had a similar discussion with a family friend at a Mardi Gras parade Saturday. One thing I did not do was tell him a certain type of gun is bad or good. I explained the pros and cons of a lot of types. That way he can research and make a decision.
Last edited: