What are everyones thoughts between the two? I have run the XP-12's and loved them, but alot of people tell me the hawks last longer and put less heat in the rotor.
03SteedaGT said:What are everyones thoughts between the two? I have run the XP-12's and loved them, but alot of people tell me the hawks last longer and put less heat in the rotor.
ShelbyGuy said:I think you should send me a free pair of the carbotechs for evaluation purposes epper:
SnkBtn99 said:I ran the carbotechs all last year coming over from the hawks ..... I will be buying the carbotechs again .... IMO .. better stopping ability than my hawks gave me ...carbotechs still have a ton of life in them after running RA, Putnam, Gingerman and Autobahn
JoeJ said:Guys,
I tried a set of carbotechs and they came apart on me. Hawks are too hard of rotors. You need to try PF 01 in the front and PF 90 in the rear. Most all my open track friends here in Texas have settled on PF pads. Both for open track, NASA, and SCCA races.
ac427cobra said:Wait a minute?! :dw: You ran RA, Putnam, Gingerman and A-B on the same set of pads?!