MHP v3 CDT & Filter Only SL65 Dyno Results: 708HP/989lb/ft at the Crank on 93 Octane!

Fourcam330

New Member
Established Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2005
Messages
6,743
Location
OH
Despite the weather (lots of rain) we hit the dyno with our SL65 today to see the improvements made via our v3 CDT (ECU & TCU Tuning) vs stock with BMC filters, and here are the results. We used the same dyno as when stock (with filters then too), same brand of 93 octane (Mobil), 4th gear, and SAE correction factor with smoothing set at 5.

567rwhp/791rwtq SAE

http://i145.photobucket.com/albums/r206/Fourcam330/MHP_SL65_Tune_001.jpg

Backed up with 563rwhp/790rwtq SAE

MHP v3 CDT vs Stock

http://i145.photobucket.com/albums/r206/Fourcam330/MHPSL65TunevsStock.jpg

Assuming 20% drivetrain loss (These cars have ridiculously heavy wheels and stout 5 speed trannys) that equates to 708HP and 989lb/ft at the crank with just tuning and filters on pump gas.

Dyno Videos:

[nomedia="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EEYlePPmboU"]YouTube - MHP v3 CDT (ECU & TCU Tune Only) SL65 AMG: 708HP & 973lb/ft at Crank[/nomedia]

[nomedia="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MZx9TBELEwE"]YouTube - MHP v3 CDT (ECU & TCU Tune Only) SL65 AMG: 704HP & 988lb/ft at Crank[/nomedia]

At the track:

[nomedia="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TVw-JPAxrH0"]YouTube - MHP SL65 Tune Only Record.m2ts[/nomedia] (Highest trap on dragtimes of all modded SL65s and most torque by a longshot despite being tune/filter only we are 2nd on the list).

Note the safe and slightly rich A/F, as the remap is intended for cars with intake and exhaust modifications which will happen soon enough.

Tuned vs Stock:

http://i145.photobucket.com/albums/r206/Fourcam330/MHPSL65TunevsStock.jpg
 

Users who are viewing this thread



Top