police officer kills man after car accident

o2k

Noob
Established Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2007
Messages
2,139
Location
NY, Ny
Police officer charged in fatal shooting of unarmed man who had just survived car accident

A North Carolina police officer was charged with voluntary manslaughter on Saturday after police say he fatally shot an unarmed man who had apparently just survived a car crash in Charlotte and was looking for help.

The victim, Jonathan Ferrell, a 24-year-old former Florida A&M University football player, was shot multiple times and pronounced dead at the scene early Saturday morning.

The 27-year-old officer, Randall Kerrick, was turned himself into police late Saturday. He was released on a $50,000 bond.

"The shooting of Mr. Ferrell was excessive,” the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department said in a statement. “Our investigation has shown that Officer Kerrick did not have a lawful right to discharge his weapon during this encounter.”

According to police, Ferrell crashed his vehicle into the woods, climbed out of his car and walked a half-mile to the nearest house. He began “banging on the door viciously,” Charlotte-Mecklenburg Chief Rodney Monroe said.

"It was quite possible he was seeking assistance based on his accident," Monroe said.

But the woman who answered the door thought Ferrell was a burglar and called police shortly after 2:30 a.m. to report an attempted break-in.

Kerrick and two other responding officers surrounded Ferrell, who “immediately charged” at the police, Monroe said. One officer tried unsuccessfully to subdue Ferrell with a taser. Kerrick then fired his weapon "several times."

“He immediately charged toward the three officers, one in particular," Monroe said. "That officer in particular fired his weapon several times, striking the individual multiple times."

“It’s with heavy hearts and significant regrets it’s come to this," Monroe added. "Our hearts go out to the Ferrell family and many members of the CMPD family."

According to the Charlotte Observer, police said initially that Kerrick's actions were “appropriate and lawful.” But a subsequent investigation found the officer, who joined the police department in 2011, had "violated the law regarding voluntary manslaughter." Under North Carolina law, voluntary manslaughter is defined as killing without malice using "excessive force" in exercising "imperfect self-defense," the paper said.

Monroe said there was no evidence Ferrell threatened the woman. Alcohol did not appear a factor in the crash, he added.

The two other officers involved in the incident were placed on paid administrative leave.

17be97cb-6e75-455a-bf6a-b4b258bb491d_kerrick-ferrell.jpg
 

Dizzyscure1

New Member
Established Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2012
Messages
1,750
Location
Louisiana
WT Eff? Doesn't make sense to me, Maybe the fella who got shot was distraught or confused. Both the cops and the victim don't make sense. In for more info. Sucks either way for both parties.
 

Dixarect

Cobro
Established Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2013
Messages
920
Location
Evansville, IN
Confusing story. Don't they train these officers how to accurately fire their weapon? Shoot his god damn leg if you're going to do something.
 

WHITESVTCOBRA

New Member
Established Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2005
Messages
1,560
Location
fayetteville,nc
To the above poster they teach to shoot center mass , during stress shooting the largest object is hard in and of its self, If you've ever had to shoot at another human you would understand trying to hit a leg is seriously reducing your chances almost to zero to end a deadly threat.....I'll wait till all the details come out to comment on this case but something must be off if they are charging the officer. means they have probable cause to take out the warrant.
 

Dixarect

Cobro
Established Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2013
Messages
920
Location
Evansville, IN
To the above poster they teach to shoot center mass , during stress shooting the largest object is hard in and of its self, If you've ever had to shoot at another human you would understand trying to hit a leg is seriously reducing your chances almost to zero to end a deadly threat.....I'll wait till all the details come out to comment on this case but something must be off if they are charging the officer. means they have probable cause to take out the warrant.

This is true. As i have never been anywhere near this kind of experience I think without actual evidence "Yet" that he was actually abusing the woman I don't think you need to exactly kill the man.

Just my .02
 

HFBPA889

BOOST MAKES ME HAPPY!!!
Established Member
Joined
Feb 14, 2012
Messages
406
Location
The Border
Doesn't sound like a good shoot, the whole story has holes in it. Hopefully everyone involved comes clean for the families sake.
 

jbs$

Active Member
Established Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2012
Messages
2,992
Location
Denver, NC
I think that a lot of different actions should have been considered before shooting to kill him. Killing a man should be a last action, not the first option.
 

DaleM

ATACMS changing the game!
Established Member
SVTP OG 4 Life
Joined
Dec 27, 2002
Messages
23,821
Location
FlahDah man.
Confusing story. Don't they train these officers how to accurately fire their weapon? Shoot his god damn leg if you're going to do something.

It is pretty much policy when you fire your gun your intent is to kill because the threat is deemed life threatening. I don't know many Officers who pull a gun to scare people or to wound them.

Waits for the rest of the story on this one.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

silver03svt

Official Snowflake Melting Machine
Established Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2010
Messages
6,794
Location
VA
This is true. As i have never been anywhere near this kind of experience I think without actual evidence "Yet" that he was actually abusing the woman I don't think you need to exactly kill the man.

Just my .02

I think that's why he was charged with the crime. The evidence obviously doesn't support the need to justify a kill. As to your previous post, LEOs are trained to shoot to kill, not maim. If deadly force is not justified, no need to pull the trigger. Options other than killing should've been exercised. While a tazer is a good non-lethal (I know that's debatable), it certainly doesn't take away the ability of 3 officers attempting to forcefully take control of an individual. As it has been said, DEADLY force is ALWAYS the final and last option.

Also awaiting more information on this story.
 
Last edited:

VenomousDSG

Get ready to fly!
Established Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2008
Messages
10,082
Location
Naperville, Il
*waits patiently for the full toxicology report*

This.

This story doesn't add up. Guy gets into a car accident, is well enough to walk HALF A MILE to a house, (if he really was in trouble, why not just use your cellphone), bangs on the door and stays at that house long enough to have police show up, then charges at the police?... From the sound of all that, I'm more inclined to side with the officer. I think the victim was on something.
 

LS2GTO

Active Member
Established Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2008
Messages
1,405
Location
where dem hoes be
Shoot a man looking for help.

Yeah cuz a black man violently banging on your door at 230 in the morning is going to have any woman thinking "hey look at this nice gentleman at the front door, let me let him into my house".

I believe both parties are the reason this guy is dead right now. The officers probably didn't take much to start mowing people down when faced with an apparent home intruder, but at the same time you don't go banging violently on people's doors at 230 in the morning and expect to be received with open arms. The heck did he think was going to happen?
 

Users who are viewing this thread



Top