For buying, I say go with an agent since the seller pays all commissions.
Definitely go with an agent. Mine, who happened to also be a good friend of the family, found a structural defect in one of the interior walls during a walkthrough. This was something I never would've noticed myself and, had it been left unchecked, would've led to costly repairs down the road. He stepped up to bat for me and got the whole room redone before we signed the papers.
Agents may cost you a bit up front. But for the peace of mind, and ease of purchase relative to going solo, it is a worthy course of action hands down.
This is the job of a home inspector which you can get without an agent. This is not a good reason to have an agent as most are there just for paperwork. I would not trust any agent checking out a home for me.
This is the job of a home inspector which you can get without an agent. This is not a good reason to have an agent as most are there just for paperwork. I would not trust any agent checking out a home for me.
For buying, I say go with an agent since the seller pays all commissions. Plus, like others have said, it's a lot and you don't want to get screwed.
Go with a agent. You'll be glad you did
Not necessary true. The majority of the time your agent will be paid from the proceed of the sale but sometimes, no.
For buying, I say go with an agent since the seller pays all commissions. Plus, like others have said, it's a lot and you don't want to get screwed.