real estate agent question

Wikkd03

Active Member
Established Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2008
Messages
1,252
Location
US
When buying a home what are the perks of using a real estate agent? What about not using one? Just curious if its really better to have one or not
 

ZincYellowGT281

Member
Established Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2010
Messages
660
Location
Northern California
I'll try to make it short & hit some key points. Purchasing or selling a home is not exactly a walk in the park. An agent can help you understand everything that is involved in the buying/selling process of a home. They can help find a home that meets your budget & requirements. An agent can also help with negotiation's with more than just the listing price, there are inspections, which can lead to repairs & depending on the cost this can lead to renegotiation. This is not like buying a car. Choosing an agent that has gone through this process will definitely make your search that much easier.
 

DriftwoodSVT

Si vis pacem, para bellum
Established Member
Joined
May 27, 2006
Messages
8,102
Location
Blanco, TX
I wouldn't try going without an agent unless you've been through the training and classes. My wife is an agent and I see just how much paperwork she goes through with clients.

Not to mention, if you have an agent, you also have some form of legal protection in case something goes wrong.
 

97ReoCobra

Member
Established Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2013
Messages
633
Location
Florida Panhandle
Purchasing a home is a complicated process with lots of possible serious problems. The knowledge and experience of the right agent is invaluable. But you should keep in mind it's a bit like having the same lawyer for both sides of a legal case. Remember the agent gets paid by the seller, and will have the sellers interests as top priority.
 

Spudz

Member
Established Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2013
Messages
423
Location
Alaska
Definitely go with an agent. Mine, who happened to also be a good friend of the family, found a structural defect in one of the interior walls during a walkthrough. This was something I never would've noticed myself and, had it been left unchecked, would've led to costly repairs down the road. He stepped up to bat for me and got the whole room redone before we signed the papers.

Agents may cost you a bit up front. But for the peace of mind, and ease of purchase relative to going solo, it is a worthy course of action hands down.
 

65fastback2+2

Active Member
Established Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2007
Messages
9,969
Location
Heaven
Definitely go with an agent. Mine, who happened to also be a good friend of the family, found a structural defect in one of the interior walls during a walkthrough. This was something I never would've noticed myself and, had it been left unchecked, would've led to costly repairs down the road. He stepped up to bat for me and got the whole room redone before we signed the papers.

Agents may cost you a bit up front. But for the peace of mind, and ease of purchase relative to going solo, it is a worthy course of action hands down.

This is the job of a home inspector which you can get without an agent. This is not a good reason to have an agent as most are there just for paperwork. I would not trust any agent checking out a home for me.
 

Spudz

Member
Established Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2013
Messages
423
Location
Alaska
This is the job of a home inspector which you can get without an agent. This is not a good reason to have an agent as most are there just for paperwork. I would not trust any agent checking out a home for me.

This is true. The house was new at the time, so I didn't bother with a home inspector. Now whether that was a good idea or not in the long run remains to be seen.

Fastback does bring up a good point. If the home is an older one, definitely worthwhile to get a home inspector to have a look as well. A good one should find anything and everything that is potentially wrong with a home.
 

CobRoush-00

Active Member
Established Member
Joined
Apr 18, 2012
Messages
1,422
Location
Long Island, NY
Agents may cost you a bit up front. But for the peace of mind, and ease of purchase relative to going solo, it is a worthy course of action hands down.[/QUOTE]

Having an agent will probably cost you nothing out of pocket except for some cicumstances that I will explain.

This is the job of a home inspector which you can get without an agent. This is not a good reason to have an agent as most are there just for paperwork. I would not trust any agent checking out a home for me.

Agree! A good agent will actually recommend that you hire a home inspector.

For buying, I say go with an agent since the seller pays all commissions. Plus, like others have said, it's a lot and you don't want to get screwed.

Not necessary true. The majority of the time your agent will be paid from the proceed of the sale but sometimes, no.

Go with a agent. You'll be glad you did

Definitely!

To summarize: I truly recommend you hire an agent but one that will have your best interest in mind. Not all agents work for you. Most of the times they are also working for the seller even though they show you the house. Make sure you interview the agent and ask him to represent you in the purchase of that property.
You will then sign a contract and the agent we act as a Buyer Broker. Therefore he owes you a fiduciary duty and everything you confide in him must stay confidential and his job will be to get you the house at the best price as possible. Yes there is work ivolved from his part. That is why he will charge you a fee, usually 2%-3%. The good part is, most of the times, that fee is already covered by the seller because the listing agent negotiated those fees. However, sometimes, the listing agent negotiates only his fees or take a low fee to sell the house. For example, a listing agent takes 3% to market a house. He will probably give 1% to whoever brings the buyer and keeps 2% for himself or herself. Now let's say you have a buyer broker working for you, and charging you 2%, he or she will only get that 1% from the other side and you, the buyer will have to pay the difference (the other 1%). That's why it's not always true that the seller pays all the fees.
My advice to you: 1-Get an agent that represents you (buyer broker). 2-Negotiate your fees as well because a great agent will with you. 3-Have everything in writing. 4-Don't be afraid to fire your agent if you are not happy with his or her work.
Good luck getting your new home and if you have any specific questions, feel free to pm me. Just keep in ming Real Estate is definitely local meaning things are different from one state to others but the basic is the same.
 

wht93gted

Member
Established Member
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
781
Location
fist pump pushup chapstick
Not necessary true. The majority of the time your agent will be paid from the proceed of the sale but sometimes, no.

I'd say that 'sometimes' is probably 1% of the time. I'm going through the buying\selling process right now (just got off the phone with my attorney because our buyers are screwing around).

Our agent is a great friend of the family, so I asked her. Aside from the times where buyers pay closing costs, or some unique agreement, agents are almost always paid from the sellers.
 

Eds01Lightning

New Member
Established Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2005
Messages
1,539
Location
Mexico Beach, Florida
As stated already if you are buying an agent cost you nothing. If you are selling by all means you will do better with a reliable agent. Well worth the average of 6% commission. Our house is currently on the market and our agent has been great..got a good contract today in fact!:beer:

This will actually be the third house this same agent has sold for us over the last 35 years. THe key word of course is a GOOD AGENT!
 

Users who are viewing this thread



Top