Rear Mount Turbo Setup

BV600

Active Member
Established Member
Joined
May 19, 2011
Messages
1,662
Location
NSB, FL
I noticed how much room is under the ass end of the car without mufflers and thought a twin setup back there would look pretty good and be simple to fabricate. Ive seen alot of cars make some power when paired with the right size turbo

What are your thoughts?:shrug:
 

04SNK390HP

I hate SHEEPLE
Established Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2006
Messages
1,709
Location
Vilseck, Germany
Thought you were trading in your car? NVM, just read your FS thread for your car.

Squires Turbo Systems make a unversal kit but their scavaging oil pump systems aren't the most reliable from what I have read.

-Nick
 
Last edited:

04SNK390HP

I hate SHEEPLE
Established Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2006
Messages
1,709
Location
Vilseck, Germany
Why not just go with a proven TT setup?

Big selling points on the rear mount systems are low engine bay temps, cheap, and they save space for diy'ers

Bad things are they add a little lag and they are prone to not being as reliable(Oil, system, ground clearance from the extra piping, a thousand clamps that can loosen and so on....)

-Nick
 
Last edited:

BV600

Active Member
Established Member
Joined
May 19, 2011
Messages
1,662
Location
NSB, FL
Thought you were trading in your car? NVM, just read your FS thread for your car.

Squires Turbo Systems make a unversal kit but their scavaging oil pump systems aren't the most reliable from what I have read.

-Nick
Yeah I am but just for an auto.
Ive heard not so good things about STS, I was thinking more of a custom setup. I had a friend with a GTO use a scavenging pump from a tractor or something.


Why not just go with a proven TT setup?

Well it makes sense but I bet the one you have cost everybit of 9k plus. The one Im talking about could be made for under 3k
 
Last edited:

BV600

Active Member
Established Member
Joined
May 19, 2011
Messages
1,662
Location
NSB, FL
Just to give more of what im thinking. This car used two comp oil less turbos and made 734/651 on 11psi.

Camaro1.gif


Camaro3.gif
 

Buster

Member
Established Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2003
Messages
276
Location
MN
That is such a sweet setup. Maybe the Paxton will have to come off soon.
 

04SNK390HP

I hate SHEEPLE
Established Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2006
Messages
1,709
Location
Vilseck, Germany
I would like to hear what Ken B and Dustin from CPR would have to comment about this type of turbo kit on a 5.0............

Looks like a sweet setup but how would it perform compared to their kits daily? Positives and negatives from a pro tuner and builder would shed more light on this topic.

-Nick
 

StevenStarke

Fast/Reliable/Cheap pick2
Established Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2011
Messages
1,262
Location
LI, NY
I feel like it's just not doing it the right way. I don't like all that charge piping, I hate oiless turbos an I hate scavenger pumps. I think it's just a ghetto way to do it, plus it adds a ton of weight.
 

Ry_Trapp0

Condom Model
Established Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2005
Messages
12,287
Location
Hebron, Ohio
i've seen some quality rear mount tech over at yellowbullet.com, i would suggest that you go do some research over there. most of the negatives that people bring up about rear mount systems are either hearsay or based on poorly designed set ups, there are a lot of quirks to building an efficient rear mount. i don't think anyone would call a rear mount optimal, but that doesn't mean that it can't be 90%(or better) of what a quality front mount is!

Cheap, Fast, Reliable...Pick 2
...or, go to theturboforum and check out examples of all 3;-) if you can do the work your self and you do your research when designing your system and picking out components, you can have all 3!
 

ed209

Member
Established Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2011
Messages
104
Location
san diego
lot of ignorant BS in this thread. a rear mount setup makes a lot of sense for a lot of people and those compressor wheels poking out through the exhausts look ****ing awesome...
 

itSSlow98

Active Member
Established Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2008
Messages
2,913
Location
Abingdon, Md.
Using the comp oilless turbos makes the most sense, they are pricey but they are reliable and makes the install SOOOO much easier.
 

Ry_Trapp0

Condom Model
Established Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2005
Messages
12,287
Location
Hebron, Ohio
Oilless turbos. I didn't even know such a thing exsisted
yep, pretty cool pieces...
Comp Turbo - Oil-Less

these guys have nice turbos with self contained oiling systems(kinda like a centrifugal supercharger)...
AEROCHARGER Turbocharger is the most advanced form of forced induction, giving you the edge over the competition. First to Boost, First to Win.
...but their turbo selection is probably too small for good ol' big american V8s(they mainly sell to powersports and motorcycles). they have a twin turbo kit for the G8 that puts out about 600 at the wheels. zero lag what so ever, their oiling system is an interesting design that reduces drag in the turbo to nothing. they're also notorious for not having any wiggle room over the stated limitations of their turbos, if they say a turbo is good for 300HP then you might be popping it at 301HP LOL. VERY nice, innovative pieces none the less! but i digress, rambling off topic here...
 
Last edited:

03DSGMach1

10's or Bust!
Established Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2006
Messages
1,149
Location
Broward County, Fl
I had a single STS turbo kit on my S197 for a couple years. The spool of a turbo and the power it made was awesome. STS designed a well thought out kit that used factory mounting points to attach the piping. Yes there was turbo lag but not as much as you would think, I was even surprised. I found it minimized the most using an electronic boost controller. While it was a good kit I prefer the traditional engine mounted setup more. No need to worry about scavenge pumps, constantly cleaning the air filter (at least once a week for me), and water potentially entering the engine (Florida rainy season sucks!!)

fa41532a.jpg

028184e1.jpg

[youtube_browser]5din4-lQ6DU[/youtube_browser]

Big selling points on the rear mount systems are low engine bay temps, cheap, and they save space for diy'ers

Bad things are they add a little lag and they are prone to not being as reliable(Oil, system, ground clearance from the extra piping, a thousand clamps that can loosen and so on....)

-Nick

Lag isn't too bad with a properly sized turbo and the use of an electronic boost controller. Piping on the STS kits are pretty good especially with regard to ground clearance. I used silicone hoses with t bolt clamps, those suckers were not going anywhere. Scavenge pump wasn't that bad but it going out always worried me.

Don't get caught in the rain with that setup.

Again, not too bad as the STS kit had water drains on the intercooler so no water would make its way to the engine. It just sucked that the filter was exposed to the rain so much. I even used the STS shield to prevent water from getting kicked up onto the filter from the tires and the sock they have limits you from going WOT as it restricts air flow.
 
Last edited:

KenB

New Member
Established Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2011
Messages
625
Location
West Palm Beach
I would like to hear what Ken B and Dustin from CPR would have to comment about this type of turbo kit on a 5.0............

Looks like a sweet setup but how would it perform compared to their kits daily? Positives and negatives from a pro tuner and builder would shed more light on this topic.

-Nick


In an attempt to not insult anyone, I will just say this...

I would never tune a 5.0 with that setup under any circumstances. In fact, I don't like remote mount systems PERIOD. There are countless reasons and you really don't need me to list them all.

I can see the lure of the cost and ease of install. But we are talking about modifying your $30k, baddest 5.0 Mustang ever built. I don't think it's a good time to pick a modification based on cost or ease install. Not with this car. I could see if it was a low cost car that you just wanted to add some 'zing' to for cheap. But I still wouldn't tune it. lol
 

StevenStarke

Fast/Reliable/Cheap pick2
Established Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2011
Messages
1,262
Location
LI, NY
In an attempt to not insult anyone, I will just say this...

I would never tune a 5.0 with that setup under any circumstances. In fact, I don't like remote mount systems PERIOD. There are countless reasons and you really don't need me to list them all.

I can see the lure of the cost and ease of install. But we are talking about modifying your $30k, baddest 5.0 Mustang ever built. I don't think it's a good time to pick a modification based on cost or ease install. Not with this car. I could see if it was a low cost car that you just wanted to add some 'zing' to for cheap. But I still wouldn't tune it. lol



^ This....




I'd do it on a bronco or something, lol.
 

Users who are viewing this thread



Top