A lot of people on this board don't give the S2k credit. Fair enough. It is low in the torque department and it revs insanely high.
Most of the time when the match-up is brought up here the GT is declared the winner without any consideration. I read a lot of "I've raced plenty of S2ks and never lost" posts on this forum.
But then you go to the S2k and the view the same topic...
http://www.s2ki.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=233161&st=0
...they dismiss the GT as the loser as quickly as the owners here dismiss the S2k as the loser. They share the same anecdotes about timeslips and experiences that favor their positions. They make the same "I have never lost to a GT comment." They make the same "They're quick, but that is it..." comments. Someone has to be wrong.
At some point personal opinion has to give way to fact, objectivity and logic. Cause in the end we are all car enthusiasts right?
So who wins? OBJECTIVELY.
Z
Most of the time when the match-up is brought up here the GT is declared the winner without any consideration. I read a lot of "I've raced plenty of S2ks and never lost" posts on this forum.
But then you go to the S2k and the view the same topic...
http://www.s2ki.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=233161&st=0
...they dismiss the GT as the loser as quickly as the owners here dismiss the S2k as the loser. They share the same anecdotes about timeslips and experiences that favor their positions. They make the same "I have never lost to a GT comment." They make the same "They're quick, but that is it..." comments. Someone has to be wrong.
At some point personal opinion has to give way to fact, objectivity and logic. Cause in the end we are all car enthusiasts right?
So who wins? OBJECTIVELY.
Z
Last edited: