Ok, so if that part is so weak, and it is made to break away as shown, either crumple or tear off, that lifting the vehicle buy other than the K member well not hurt it? Those 4 bolts hold up all that front end weight, and so your telling me a part mad to bend and break, isn't going to do either when all that's holdin it up is 4 BOLTS??!!!! I'm still not convinced that a part made to break off isn't going to break off when it's the only part holding up the front end, I'm sorry, just doesn't make sense.
There a number of factors at play with respect to the area we are discussing here and in the context of also using that area to support the weight (or a portion thereof) of the vehicle. With respect to your statement that...
...if that part is so weak...
Again, that area of the floorpan was not designed to be load bearing, as in supporting the weight of the vehicle. It is an added section of the floorpan stamping and it has no support. It is thin and it does indeed tear very easily. Witness what happened when a chain was attached to a stamped hole in it when a tow truck operator tried to pull the vehicle forward. Like tearing the tab off of a soda can...
Those 4 bolts hold up all that front end weight...
No. The four bolts that are holding up "all that front end weight" are at the main beam portion of the crossmember that runs perpendicular to the length of the car. They are the four bolts that are attaching the K-member to the structural frame rails as shown in this S197 chassis crop.
I highlighted them in red for you
The arms that are attached to the main portion that tail off and attach to the floor are there to locate the rear pivot of the front lower control arm. While they do help to keep the body square to the K-member, they were not designed to support the vehicle with respect to jacking or lifting. The tails are merely two thin stampings attached to each other by a few, sparse, welds. This is a view taken from the end of one of those tails.