sup fello machers!
has neone here raced one of these neons yet?
how was the outcome?
has neone here raced one of these neons yet?
how was the outcome?
Originally posted by wurd2
I would like to see how many times that SRT-4 can run 12's before visiting the shop.
Originally posted by wurd2
How do the SRT-4's measure up against the STI's and Evo's? I think this is a better comparison.
Originally posted by wurd2
I'm not surprised that the smaller and lighter 4-cylinder cars with monster turbos are running those times. I really wonder how long those small engines can handle the horsepower.
Do you think those engines will ever see the 100,000 mile mark?
Originally posted by wurd2
I know people put money into the SRT-4 to hang with and sometimes beat stock Cobra's and Mach1's, but the Cobra and Mach1 are a better platform to invest your money into, especially the Cobra. I'm not sure which route would be cheaper, but in the end, the heavily modded Cobra's and Mach1's will bring the slaughter to the heavily modded SRT-4's all day long.
Originally posted by wurd2
I just don't think we should be comparing the SRT-4's to Cobra's and Mach1's, even if you can pour enough money into the SRT-4 to make it just as fast, or faster. Pour the money into the better platform.
How do the SRT-4's measure up against the STI's and Evo's? I think this is a better comparison.
Originally posted by wurd2
Are these highly modified SRT-4's vs stock Mach1's and Cobra's? Are any of these Mach1 and Cobra drivers skilled, as compared to the SRT-4 drivers?
This just doesn't make sense to me.
Originally posted by wurd2
I'll just be honest and admit that I don't know a whole lot about how altitude affects drag racing, but I'm definitely confused as to why Mach1's and Cobra's are all losing to SRT-4's.
Is there some other explanation here?
Are these highly modified SRT-4's vs stock Mach1's and Cobra's? Are any of these Mach1 and Cobra drivers skilled, as compared to the SRT-4 drivers?
This just doesn't make sense to me.
I'm sorry, but stock for stock, the Mach1 and the Cobra will take the SRT-4 under normal conditions. I just have to believe that, someone educate me if I'm wrong. Otherwise, chime in.
I think Ford went with a smaller displacement for fuel efficiency.
Originally posted by Poisonous Mods
Of course stock for stock a Mach1 will beat a SRT 4. Shit even a stock Z06 will be a stock 03 Cobra. SRT 4's are cheaper then the Mach's and a Mach has to be modded a whole lot to do the times ive seen the SRT 4 lay down. So eventually the Mach ends up being even more expensive. This line is used far to often with out thinking about it.....either way, i wont buy no stinking front wheel drive car for the drag strip :nonono:
The only real reasons that the SRT 4's are winning is cause they are just upgrading to a hugh Turbo...thats all.
From LACR...2710' above sea level to Carlsbad.....200' above sea level the difference in times is about 3 to 4tenths of a sec....dependent on weather and track prep.
Originally posted by Poisonous Mods
East Coast is excluded sir Pete
Cali Tracks do not compare to East Coast Tracks....plus non of u east coast folks would be able to back up ur runs in SoCal