Dp
Last edited:
Ive seen a guy with POSI's port putting down 549RWHP.
I agree! Also, 96stanggt and lthl vnm both claim 550rwhp on dynojets, and both have the stage 3 port.
If the snake bite does make 550 sae on multiple cars, then I will be a believer.
I was always under the impression that Kevin hit his number on a Mustang Dyno.
Some of you guys are starting to sound a little pathetic with these dyno numbers, especially when it's only a 10-20hp difference. I put down 427whp on my buddy's Dynojet with only intake/exhaust. With intake/exhaust/stg 4 port it put down 420whp on the same untouched dyno. Now that obviously isn't correct because the car pulled much harder than before so it was due to the weather, but the variables and inconsistencies show. But it sounds rediculous when you talk about this part and that part will get me these numbers when the numbers hardly matter unless everyone is doing it in the same conditions with the same dyno.
Dwight's got it. My numbers were hit on Amazon's mustang dyno in the middle of winter (20*). The most it's layed down so far on a dynojet were 541rwhp STD or 530rwhp SAE in the middle of summer (93*). With the updated (Posi) port and Dragon setup it's going to make more power, already has even with through tuning issues. Since I'm still working through the tuning issues I haven't bothered posting up the new numbers or progress.
I was always under the impression that Kevin hit his number on a Mustang Dyno. And I thought that LTHL VNM's best was 535/531 STD on Strictly's Dynojet.
Sounds like the happy customer knob was set to max.
You could be totally correct about LTH VNM's numbers. I'm not really all that familiar with his setup or what his top numers have been. I just knew that he was tuned at Strictly Performance and they tend to graph results in STD. Heck, most all of the shops that have dynoed my car have used STD.........hmm... I was under the same impression, as his sig used to read those numbers. However, he moved back to the same town I live in, and has told me, and posted here, that it put down 550/546 .. I didn't argue, because I wasn't there, but I will ask for a graph.
so thats prob uncorrected. SAE makes a level playing field by using the same "variables" all the time. you/your tuner was prob shooting for actual power that day. if they are both SAE...well....
i would get it just cuz it sound like a bad mofo
You could be totally correct about LTH VNM's numbers. I'm not really all that familiar with his setup or what his top numers have been. I just knew that he was tuned at Strictly Performance and they tend to graph results in STD. Heck, most all of the shops that have dynoed my car have used STD.........
What i find unacceptable is that Stieg started this thread of his own volition on 7-09...and here we are 1+ month later, and we've yet to see a single shred of evidence of what this super-top secret/skunkworks/KGB/CIA/NSA/Project Blue Book/.......fill in the blank/be-all-end-all Eaton is capable of. The silence is deafening, Bob.
Me thinks you might have stepped in it this time.