poopnut2 said:I think the 84-85's had around 190hp. The 86's had 200hp. 1/4 mile times were around high 14's. About the same as stock 5.0's of the same year. Pain in the ass to maintain but cool cars and with some work can be made fast as hell.
Steeltwo said:from my understanding and what my friend who is a mustang nut (owns a tt stang) the SVO was faster than the 5.0.
L et me know if you need any more info, I have had 4 svo mustangsfordrules said:Sounds Awesome I need to just go ahead and buy it.
mustangjr said:L et me know if you need any more info, I have had 4 svo mustangs
I will keep that in mind. This whole 4cyl turbo thing is all new to me.
mustangjr said:That is a fact. The 5.0 of the day was about $3700 less than a svo but it did not have adjustable Koni shocks and four wheel vented disc brakes amoung many other things.
BittenInBama said:Poopnut is correct when he said they are a pain to maintain. I had a 86 for 9 years...when i was running right it was an absolute blast to drive and with the exhaust I had, sounded extremely cool too. Several people had to look under hood to conceed it was a four cyl.
Parts are becomeing more of an issue. Few parts interchange with sister mustangs and OEM stuff is getting pricey. Lincoln LSCs are good for a lot of parts for SVOs.
If you are on the SVOCA, word questions carefully until you are accepted in the family. Most are great guys and will go out of thier way to help out. Others will hand you your head in a heartbeat for little to no reason. Or for fun, ask about putting a SVO specific part on another type car :-D and let the fun begin :banana:
poopnut2 said:I've only driven one 86' SVO and my 87' felt quite a bit quicker when it was stock than that SVO did. The only thing I like about the SVO's is the 4-wheel disc brakes. 5-lug. And the seats are badass.