^^^
my vote goes to KB :rockon:
my vote goes to KB :rockon:
"What is the best supercharger for a 97 Cobra?"
One that comes with forged pistons and rods!oke::-D
440 rwhp here with the little ity bitty 1.5 9.5-10psi
i had both the kb 1.5, and a vortech s trim on my car.. i would deff, go with the kb for a street car.. the vortech sounded great.. but you have to realize your not going to make good boost until higher rpms.. the kenne bell will reach full boost by 2500rpm, and hold it all the way up the rpm range.. im thinking about buying the new 2.1kb for my car, and running it with meth..
What are your track times?
last outing with about 60 less hp i ran a high 11 I havent tried with my new found power but im guessing low 11's and im playing with the idea of some nitrous as well should be a 10 sec street car
Is the car full weight? Big n littles? What was your mph and was this in good air or this summer shit right now?
I've stayed out of this thread for a while but was bored so I decided to see what the deal was and I am, as predicted, frustrated. I'm not going to engage in a "what supercharger is better" squabble as I have done this several times and it just turns into a pissing match. OP do YOUR OWN research on the several different brands and types of supercharger. Remember that there are centrifugal superchargers, positive displacement superchargers(twin screw and root screw) and a newer addition, a rotorex supercharger which is very similar to a centrifugal but spins at a much higher blower speed. For 96-98 Cobra's your options are very limited. Use google to search for the specs on Procharger, Vortech/Paxton and Kenne Bell. There is also a sticky in the Blower Bistro that covers the differences in the superchargers. After you have done the research yourself and decide what it is you want out of your car then you can make a good decision. I fear you will get a 1.5L KB and be very disapointed when it only makes 340rwhp.
mine makes 100 more lol its all in how you do it lol
what is your trap speed and vehicle weight?
440 rwhp and that weight and only 118.. means you were on a generous dyno. My p1sc on 11 psi trapped 96 in the 8th on a shitty 1.9 60ft in summer air, full weight vert Dyno'd mid 400's
440 rwhp and that weight and only 118.. means you were on a generous dyno. My p1sc on 11 psi trapped 96 in the 8th on a shitty 1.9 60ft in summer air, full weight vert Dyno'd mid 400's
i was thinking the exact opposite; thats fast for 440whp IMO.
the dyno i was on said i made 374whp, and i trap in my sig at full weight. hows that for a conservative dyno? dyno numbers are junk, trap/weight is where its at.
lol come up here at 5500 ft and 8000+ density alt and tell me what you think:lol1:
and 118 mph traps are good for mid-low 11's i also ran many 95-97mph 1/8 with 97 being my best. I say 120-122 mph traps are now in my grasp and low 11 with my bigs n littles.
It has a lot to do with suspension and traction to run good et's as we all should know but the mph is where the power is in most cases. Most 03-04 cobras with eatons making 44x are running upper to mid 11's with 118-124 traps and weigh 3600 lbs or more, for comparison. You altitude though is crazy, so that would be pretty fast at sea level!
Thing about dyno numbers in higher altitude is that they are almost always over represented with a FI car. The dyno has the ability to take in account the elevation change and adjust the numbers accordingly, in a n/a set up. With a FI set up you are providing your own compensation for elevation and the dyno doesn't recognize it. Thats why you see ridiculously over inflated dyno numbers from cars in higher altitudes.