496 rwhp 03 cobra vs lamborghini Gallardo

dgussin1

If I offend you, IDGAF
Established Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2003
Messages
9,827
Location
los angeles
there is either something seriously wrong with the cobra or it doesn't have 496whp or the lambo is seriously modded. That cobra is a low 11 second player @ over 122 while the lambo is a low 12 second player @ around 115-118.
 

supercoolsix

Member
Established Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2005
Messages
418
Location
Bay Area
sh*t, a win is a win.. but that whoop@ss doesnt make sense... 496rwhp (550 bhp) vs. stock gallardo (500 Base HP)??

weight matters but that guy got killed!
 
Last edited:

robiferretti

New Member
Established Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2002
Messages
1,473
Location
bergen county NJ
guys to put it in perspective, if the cobra dynoed 496 in good air and it was hot tonight say it was making 450 to the wheels...@ 3600lbs+2 people= 3900lbs

Gallardo 3300lbs +1 person 3450 lbs with 430 whp and much better gearing...results surprised me a little but not really, the G is geared much better over 125 mph
 

909

New Member
Established Member
Joined
May 21, 2003
Messages
158
Location
PDX, PHX
I had a chance to race a Gallardo from a roll, 50 to 110 (I had a passenger in my car who can concur). My KB 03 was laying down 606 whp at the time. Let me tell you that the Gallardo and I were almost dead even. Those things are way faster than they say. I bet many of the owners don't go throw them on the dyno to see what they make, but if they did I be it would prove they don't make 550 at the crank. Those things are really fast.
 

pwnt04

Frickin' Ladies Man
Established Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2004
Messages
1,560
Location
Quad Cities, IL
I remember this one time a Cobra lost to a Gallardo but everyone pretended like it shouldn't have. Oh wait.. that's this thread.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jan 9, 2005
Messages
993
Location
home
That Lamborghini put BUS LENGTHS on that Cobra....
I've always wanted to see a Lambo vs. Terminator because I always figured a nicely modded Terminator would win--but I guess not!!! Damn! I hope that something was misheard here...either that Lambo wasn't really stock (they said just intake) or the Cobra guy couldn't drive...or the Lambo just really beat him fair and square.
What year was that Gallardo? Was it an Automatic?
 

FriscoCobra

newbie
Established Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2005
Messages
146
Location
San Francisco
didn't surprise me at all to tell you the truth. The lambo is much lighter, had one less person, and they raced from a roll. If it was a quarter mile race from a dig it would have probably been closer. Italian cars tend to be geared more for mid range and top end speed. just my 2 cents. That was a bad ass lambo
 

dgussin1

If I offend you, IDGAF
Established Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2003
Messages
9,827
Location
los angeles
12.3 @ 117.400 Road and Track
12.4 @ 118.000 Car and Driver
12.5 @ 116.700 Motor Trend
12.6 @ 111.210 Private Citizen

These are times for a gallardo from 4 different people. The best trap is 118 and the lowest is 111. a 496whp cobra will trap at worst 119 and at best 127. So I don't see how the lambo puts bus lengths on this cobra, unless the cobra is fugged up.

I have beat diablos badly on my street tune and I am sure a diablo is faster than a gallardo.
 

ALLAN-LAMBO

New Member
Established Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2005
Messages
65
Location
Maui
Dgussin said:
12.3 @ 117.400 Road and Track
12.4 @ 118.000 Car and Driver
12.5 @ 116.700 Motor Trend
12.6 @ 111.210 Private Citizen

These are times for a gallardo from 4 different people. The best trap is 118 and the lowest is 111. a 496whp cobra will trap at worst 119 and at best 127. So I don't see how the lambo puts bus lengths on this cobra, unless the cobra is fugged up.

I have beat diablos badly on my street tune and I am sure a diablo is faster than a gallardo.


And the fastest test of my Esprit shows 112 through the 1/4, but yet miraculously, i beat a 118mph 11 sec Camaro.
 

Users who are viewing this thread



Top