Unpullied 04 Cobra puts down 429 rwhp (SAE)

NasteeNate

2V Warrior
Established Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2005
Messages
10,314
Location
Jersey
I have a theory that in the early years many were going on the dyno at 800 miles to 1200 miles. Not enough time to properly break in the motor. Others like myself waited 3 or 4 thousand miles and were rewarded with higher numbers (416/379 SAE with K&N and catback)
By the time they got around to the custom tunes most now had enough break in miles for the rings to seat properly and maybe for the computer to learn the parameters resulting in more uniform numbers.
That being said, manufacturing tolerances and other variables make every one unique.

Sounds like the truth to me:rockon: I can't wait to get mine!
 

Sonny

New Member
Established Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2006
Messages
6
Location
Arlington, Va.
Say it ain't so Joe!

I have a theory that in the early years many were going on the dyno at 800 miles to 1200 miles. Not enough time to properly break in the motor. Others like myself waited 3 or 4 thousand miles and were rewarded with higher numbers (416/379 SAE with K&N and catback)
By the time they got around to the custom tunes most now had enough break in miles for the rings to seat properly and maybe for the computer to learn the parameters resulting in more uniform numbers.
That being said, manufacturing tolerances and other variables make every one unique.

Formula race car motors are manufactured and sealed so you can't legally mess with them before a race. Teams with big bucks just buy 30 of so of them, dyno each one, keep the hottest and sell the rest. Say it ain't so Joe! The moral of the story is something we all experience every once in a while. You get your hands on a car that's supposed to be like everybody else's, but it's just hot.
 

9746Cobra

spinnin4Vs
Established Member
Joined
May 30, 2004
Messages
834
Location
Florida
stock pulley and tune, o/r H, weld in flowmaster 2-chambers, K&N FIPK2, 399hp on an 80 degree day. 29K miles.

9746C
 

mpe331lx

Mine's stock too
Established Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2005
Messages
1,201
Location
P.C FL
Yesterday I installed a couple go fast goodies to my buddies car (the one that this thread is about.
I put on my old Stg4 ported eaton and a 2.8 upper. he'll be getting a tune this saturday. so we'll se if he makes a big improvement or not.
 

Ex President

Dirt Track Specialist
Established Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2006
Messages
518
Location
Greenville,Texas
Steeda RAI, Bassani X, Flowmaster Cat-back = 439HP/406Trq SAE on a dyno jet...

I'm thinking it's cause it's orange... :shrug: :banana:
 
Last edited:

CobraBob

Authorized Vendor
Established Member
Premium Member
Single Barrel Sirs
Joined
Nov 17, 2002
Messages
105,629
Location
Cheshire, CT
I have a theory that in the early years many were going on the dyno at 800 miles to 1200 miles. Not enough time to properly break in the motor. Others like myself waited 3 or 4 thousand miles and were rewarded with higher numbers (416/379 SAE with K&N and catback)
By the time they got around to the custom tunes most now had enough break in miles for the rings to seat properly and maybe for the computer to learn the parameters resulting in more uniform numbers.
That being said, manufacturing tolerances and other variables make every one unique.
Interesting theory, and certainly a factor. I believe another factor is the tune that came from the factory coupled with manufacturing tolerances. I remember well that some stock Terminators were posting dyno sheets with a fatter A/F than others. The A/F curves varied sometimes widely from other stock Terminators. Whereas aftermarket tunes are more consistent as far as A/F. So manufacturing tolerances, tune and break-in are all reasons why the reported spread was so wide. Interesting subject.
 

NateV8

Active Member
Established Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2004
Messages
4,236
Location
Pittsburgh, PA
My car put down 435rwhp / 395rwtq when all I had was M55 catback, UPR O/R X, and K&N FIPK. No tune.
 

TrickStang37

New Member
Established Member
Joined
Oct 29, 2006
Messages
1,464
Location
San Jose
My car put down 435rwhp / 395rwtq when all I had was M55 catback, UPR O/R X, and K&N FIPK. No tune.

ya, but what was it trapping? should be about 116 atleast I would think. I trapped 117.5 with 442rwhp on a full weight vert (so far).
 

mpe331lx

Mine's stock too
Established Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2005
Messages
1,201
Location
P.C FL
metalhead131 got his car tuned yesterday with the port, 2.8 upper and 55lb inj and put down 496SAE (512STD). We did not get any torqu readings due to a problem with the dyno. The numbers were based on MPH instead of rpm.

I am very impressed with what it put down with minimal mods. Now he needs to take it back to the same dyno that it made 429 on to compare the numbers.

John: (metalhead131), I cant PM you because you dont have enough posts. You should leave your old HP numbers on your profile for the timeslip database until you make a pass with the new combo (Thats why I haven't updated mine). It looks kind of funny with 496HP and only 391TQ running a 12.98 @ 110, lol. I cant wait to see a 11.40 @ 124 out of your beast
 
Last edited:

Jroc

Active Member
Established Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2007
Messages
7,900
Location
SC
My car made 490/502 STD with a 2.93 on an unported blower, Magnaflow CB, O/R Prochamber, and K&N FIPK. 483 SAE.
 

x NOODLES x

Big Hitter da LLama!
Established Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2005
Messages
6,155
Location
Spokane, WA
My car made 490/502 STD with a 2.93 on an unported blower, Magnaflow CB, O/R Prochamber, and K&N FIPK. 483 SAE.

Surely you jest.

Either give a FULL list of mods or start thinking before you go making up numbers on this, of all forums.
 

Jroc

Active Member
Established Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2007
Messages
7,900
Location
SC
Surely you jest.

Either give a FULL list of mods or start thinking before you go making up numbers on this, of all forums.

Don't say I'm making something up, because your calling me a liar and I would never lie about #'s I made on a dyno. Unless the guy who I bought the car from just didn't want to say he had the blower ported or throw a stroker motor in it or something I don't know where the extra power came from. Yes I do recognize those are freakish #'s for my mods, but what do you want me to do, deny what I made?

Here is my dyno sheet.
my tune.jpg


Here is a picture of my motor.
hpim0153.jpg


Also read here.
http://www.carolinarides.com/forum/showthread.php?t=30720
 
Last edited:

SCT2003

2012 3.7 & 1986 NOTCH
Established Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2006
Messages
974
Location
Los Angeles
I made 403 to the wheels with just a Dynomax CB and LFP filter!!!(without a tune)

Pulley, plugs and RET 91 octane tune brought me up to 466.

I've heard of many non-pulley cars hitting 425 or so with the right tune.

Later...Dave
 

beabout

New Member
Established Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2002
Messages
890
Location
Oklahoma
Mods: K&N FIPK gen II, Bassani HP cats x-pipe cat back, predator tune by RWTD.

421 RWHP and 400 RWTQ on 91...
 

Uncle Meat

Zircon Encrusted Tweezers
Established Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2002
Messages
6,353
Location
Prattville, Alabama
My car made 490/502 STD with a 2.93 on an unported blower, Magnaflow CB, O/R Prochamber, and K&N FIPK. 483 SAE.
Really shouldn't post STD numbers since they are so very dependent on the atmospheric conditions at the time of the pull. makes it hard to properly compare with everyone else.

Surely you jest.

Either give a FULL list of mods or start thinking before you go making up numbers on this, of all forums.
He's posting STD numbers.

U.M.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread



Top