Anyone else frustrated with Ford over the next GT500?
- Thread starter biminiLX
- Start date
Sorry Dusten, what release? A drawing?
Please fill us in on the specs of this great release you speak of...transmission? Motor? Order date? MSRP?
Oh that's right, you just are here to call people names and poke fun at stuff you have no idea about to make yourself feel cooler.
Congrats, you're the cool kid on the block with zero information.
Blown standard crank 5.2 with 10A option, 750 hp, $64K "Base" MSRP, banks open 10/2018. Howd I do?
Sounds great, got a link we can verify or is this conjecture?
He was speaking of the quote below. Why you put all your faith behind MT and other false sources, while disbelieving DBK is unknown.
Purple. Purple. Purple.
I'd go stripe-less, but it would look amazing in purple.
It was nice of you to welcome him to your club.
GIVE ME ORANGE!!!!!!!
Honestly you can piece together all the info that has leaked out to come up with what I just said, outside of the trans confirmation.
No smartass. You wanted dbk to spill the beans since mt was about to anyways. The mt releaese was as useless as expected. So why don't you enlighten us.
Im not an insider, but I also have been here long enough to know dbk knows his shit.
Yes, you can piece together all this info from "leaked" sources which can't be verified (which is a big no no around here I found out).
Very mature reply and in no way helpful.
I don't have a source any more, said that quite some time ago, so good job following along.
Of course I want DBK to spill the beans IF he knew something...who wouldn't?
I've been here long enough to know that sometimes some people do know things, but I haven't heard one bit of verifiable information from anyone on this other than people saying "no" to everyone who does offer a piece of intel.
Fact is that this project has been very tight lipped and not everyone that was "in the loop" in the past is in the loop for this one.
Everyone want's to throw stones and claim BS on people sharing information, but then they don't share any themselves...there's plenty of ways to share information without burning your bridges, especially in today's day and age...so you need to sit back and wonder why nobody is spilling the beans if they really have any?
You still don’t get it. I did not think anyone could be this ignorant....
Do you wonder how he can be so certain your info was BS before it proved to be? Maybe just maybe he knows exactly what he speaks of....
Do you wonder how he can be so certain your info was BS before it proved to be? Maybe just maybe he knows exactly what he speaks of....
I know from a career of having a security clearance that the easiest way yo lose your insider info is to open your mouth about it.
My post was in no way meant to be helpful. It was to continue to point out that you know nothing. You spout bullshit in an attempt to look important, when in fact you're not.
And "anymore" in quotes on your source. The one you can't prove worked with ford, and dbk posted that the project lead has never heard of.
Good story, but again, neither you nor anyone else has provided proof.
Happy for your security clearance, been there done that, but lets be honest here: An anonymous post on the internet about a project that literally has an unknown number of people working on it would hardly point to any one person...unless you signed your name to it, lol.
Facts are facts and unless someone here wants to post up some sort of proof (photo/video) or states specs (he hasn't even done that) that can be verified later, then their conjecture is no more real than anyone else's.
I could care less how I look to you or anyone else and we still don't have ANYONE telling us anything other than "no".
I haven't seen anything posted that is verifiable by anyone yet.
Please explain how someone can "know exactly what he speaks of" if you don't post "exactly what he speaks of"?
Saying "no" to people doesn't count, lol.
We are talking about the guy who had Raj's Ford GT stored in his personal shop, owns the Ford GT forum, and hangs out with the Ford family in their booth at Le Mans.
You talk about security clearance and being tight lipped, which is exactly what he is doing. If he says "no" to an idea you have, it's probably a good idea to look in a different direction. If he came out and said "yeah it's going to have a 2.65SC 5.2CPC 755hp, 700tq, it runs 10.6s all day and will eclipse 205 mph with a 315/335 tire setup" he would probably lose some of his privileges or face penalties if he has signed a non-disclosure.
You talk about security clearance and being tight lipped, which is exactly what he is doing. If he says "no" to an idea you have, it's probably a good idea to look in a different direction. If he came out and said "yeah it's going to have a 2.65SC 5.2CPC 755hp, 700tq, it runs 10.6s all day and will eclipse 205 mph with a 315/335 tire setup" he would probably lose some of his privileges or face penalties if he has signed a non-disclosure.
Looks like frustration brewing!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Literally basically everyone.
Wrong bullshit is not intel. It's wrong bullshit.
Super not tight lipped at all really. I mean the car is nowhere near public hands and the powertrain has literally been shown, in photos, on the internet.
Confirming that wrong bullshit is wrong bullshit one way to do so.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
A lot of wasted space on this thread with speculations and nonsensical debating. I’ll stop here to “save” needed space for when the car is further revealed.
With that said, love the above overhead depictions. Would look bad ass in red candy or sonic blue! Anyone interested in a slightly used ‘14?
With that said, love the above overhead depictions. Would look bad ass in red candy or sonic blue! Anyone interested in a slightly used ‘14?
Users who are viewing this thread
