Isn’t that why people in here are saying using deadly force was justified?
So what exactly is the argument for shooting him then? Because the law allows it?
Sent from my iPhone using the svtperformance.com mobile app
You’re authorized to use deadly force if you’re in fear of your life or serious bodily harm, but you know that. I’m sure the argument is for the latter, and I’m still not convinced the shooting was justified.
Personally, I think this is the case that should have gone to trial when compared to Zimmerman.
Edit - I was telling my wife how I felt about this shooting and she said it must be HIGHLY questionable if I’m on the fence. Most times I feel it’s pretty easy to see whether a SYG claim is legit.
Last edited: