So what car ran slower than a stock cobra
with an obvious piss poor driver running 13.2 with a 1.8 sixty....why yes. but even that driver would be slower than a stock cobra driving one. lots of really bad driving. granny shifting.
So what car ran slower than a stock cobra
with an obvious piss poor driver running 13.2 with a 1.8 sixty....why yes. but even that driver would be slower than a stock cobra driving one. lots of really bad driving. granny shifting.
5.0 police has arrived. The 5.0 should have killed the Cobra and the Camaro because we all know a 5.0 should NEVER run a horrible 13.2!:lol:
So what car ran slower than a stock cobra
Good runs. I think the DA there is probably on the high side too. From what I've read, I would expect the 5.0 to run a sub 13 with a 1.8 60'. I'd expect the 5.0 to run just a little harder than 110, too. Then again, I've been in Germany since they came out and haven't seen them with my own eyes at the track or anything. Maybe they aren't as strong as people say.
To the guy saying the 1000 hp camaro should trap higher, think again. If all you know about the car is that it made 1000hp, you don't really know much. That could be 1k at the wheels, or more likely 850 at the wheels, and an estimated 1k at the crank. Beyond that, is it on street tires? Is it a turbo car with a manual tranny that has no boost off of the line, and no boost between shifts? If the car is a manual turbo car, 141 really isn't all that bad.