^ ooo you sir you deliver
Going down now:
By Chevy logic, you will have 640 hp by the end of your 1500 mile break-in period lmao.!
Nice numbers.
Wait till it gets 1500 miles on it. I read in another Forum that is when it makes maximum HP! LOL!
yea believe me, i've been racking my brain trying to figure out how we're seeing these numbers from this engine, lol. my previous theory was that the rated HP was lower than the actual HP in the over-rev range, but the dyno sheet from the 5.0mag shut that one down(although the hotrod mag article begs to differ).Face-Off right now!!!!! do some pulls on a closed course!!!!
@rytrapp, thanx for clearing that up. Im not a mechanical expert by any means just trying to hazard a guess because the drivetrain loss right now is very low, which is good I guess! :beer:
yea believe me, i've been racking my brain trying to figure out how we're seeing these numbers from this engine, lol. my previous theory was that the rated HP was lower than the actual HP in the over-rev range, but the dyno sheet from the 5.0mag shut that one down(although the hotrod mag article begs to differ).
i'm pretty much coming to the conclusion that either A) the SAE doesn't care if cars are overrated or, B) ford managed to fudge the SAE testing. there's all kinds of stories about the "old days" when the manufacturers would test their engines with tube headers(LOL). the SAE changed its testing policies to prevent this, but, lets be honest, there's ALWAYS a way to cheat:-D
If we keep seeing more of these 600+ rwhp pulls, I'm going to be wondering WTF is up with the disparity between the dyno #s and the SAE #s. 662 at the crank should mean in the 560s at the wheels......less drivetrain loss? :shrug:
lmao!C5 is sweating more now than John Edwards awaiting a paternity test.
damn straight:rockon:if you ain't cheating your not trying.....:lol1:
SVT did it right by not promising a damn thing, LOL.Whatever it is.....if the 1/4 mile times match the dynos....Ford under-promised and over-delivered.....*ahem GM *ahem
1 question DBK, is that an auto ZL1 in the picture? Sorry if I missed it.
Aw....so it's not happening?
This is worse than prom night.
There are plenty of 2011-12's making 500-520whp at 6,250rpm so these 600whp dyno numbers from the 2013 seem perfectly in line considering its making a extra 112hp and 750 more rpm.
Heck dont most 638hp ZR1's only put down 530-540whp? sucks for them as that only 10whp more then my and few others stock 2011-12 GT500's have made the same day a new 5.0 put down 365whp at a AED dyno day.