His moderate bolt-on, automatic LT1 pulls Mach 1's and LS1's from a low roll? I doubt it unless they were running or driven poorly.
Last edited:
Noooooo way at all!! Where did you hear that from? 5.0's (GT) were struggling to get into the 14's, I assume the Cobra to be a tad bit faster (since they are basically kind of almost the same i think? :shrug
If the 1993 Cobra really had 235 hp then the LS1 fbody's really had 305, lol. 93 Cobras were (are) awesome cars.
And youre nothing more then a street hixie with ALOT of money into a car so you think you're some big hotshot with all this amazing knowledge. Ive dragged 3 muscle cars I have owned, but I wouldn't really call my old 2V a muscle car. My old bolt on M6 LS1 was the quickest I've owned and I certainly wasn't afraid of anything Ford had to offer at the time. (mod for mod)
The Cobra changed all that but once again was a full one year behind the Fbody demise, not to mention it was the best car ford had to offer for a Mustang. GMP had SLP do thier Firehawks with a 345hp package.
Next.
:lol:
I was a good member on LS1tech, and I still post there under another alias.
I got into it with a mod on SSU (I was a tech mod there) and although I was in the right he had more power so I got the boot...so what?
Next.
I am happy with my car, I could care less how fast I make it.
I could 383/396 LE3, forge and Procharge my LT1 and waste a bunch of money, and thats what it would be because I care less.
Driving an R1 was enough for me.
Truth is I am happy with what I got, and have plans for an 02 WS6 M6 in the future, I really miss the 6 speed.
My current bolt on car runs low 13's maybe at best and from dig's or low speed rolls enough to pull Mach 1's, stock LS1's, new GT's and so forth... not bad for 1992 technology.
Thats all the fun I need.
Got anymore dad?
you could do this you could do that but you dont... because you are a big tool. your shits slow and you flap your gums about the lt1 like its 1993. i figured you threw in the towel after gettin owned in earlier posts but you just keep going. rember i went faster with a 2v gt with less mods than your lt1. honestly does that make it hard for you to sleep at night? your a walking lt1 hard on. you run 13.6 you spew bullshit out of your mouth like your car runs low 9's. you have ZERO ground to stand on. your a magazine racer. well i could do this and there was some dingleclow on ls1tech that did that and blah blah give it up. you are a BIG TOOL
Stock Termi's run 13's.your shits slow
To a little **** like you? :bored:and you flap your gums about the lt1 like its 1993. i figured you threw in the towel after gettin owned in earlier posts but you just keep going.
LT1 > 2V those cars are embarrassing excuses for a domestic muscle car.rember i went faster with a 2v gt with less mods than your lt1.
Im not the one wetting diapers.honestly does that make it hard for you to sleep at night? .
So what if my car runs 8's? What does that have to do with anything?you spew bullshit out of your mouth like your car runs low 9's
Magazine racer huh? Nice one.:bored:you have ZERO ground to stand on. your a magazine racer.
Thats all you got?well i could do this and there was some dingleclow on ls1tech that did that and blah blah give it up. you are a BIG TOOL
Well done pal, you said it all.:rockon::rockon::beer:epper:
lol.
-snip- He's going to tell other people that they need to grow up?
I remember when the LT1 came out in the Camaro in 93. They did a test and the Cobra won with a 13.7 I believe to Camaro's 13.8 ;-)
+1, seems a bit too fast if you ask me, did anyone actually run these times?? :shrug::??: Burnzilla, you are ignoring my facts YET AGAIN!!! :lol1:Impressive on both accounts... did they do any 'cheating' like I used to hear about back in the day? *You know..pulled filter, removed sway, etc*?
Impressive on both accounts... did they do any 'cheating' like I used to hear about back in the day? *You know..pulled filter, removed sway, etc*?
I think you are talking about the 10 minute tune-up. It was like pulling the filter, using a short belt, etc. They did that later in the test and it ran a 13.47 I think. I'de have to find it. It's in the SVT recognition guide.
Yes, I know this is not the norm for the 93 Cobras. Just like the 12.43 that Evan Smith ran in an 03 Cobra isn't the norm for them
BWAAAHAAAAHAAA!!!burnzilla, you have one infraction point left until you are banned. Clean up your act pronto.
BWAAAHAAAAHAAA!!!
:lol:
Where will he go next? ClubSI?
S.
i think the Cobras of the 96s and stuff kept up well stock for stock but where the mustang was slower was on the street, when boltons and cams were added the mustangs couldnt go mod for mod unless they put a blower on. They couldnt put a set of cams in and keep up with a cammed lt1 in HP or price. Thats why i consider mustangs to be a little slower until the terminator rolled around then its a differnet story
I can somewhat agree with this statement however you have to take into cosideration that the 4.6 4v and 2v were basically brand new and no aftermarket help yet while the 350 has been around for a good 50+years
I can somewhat agree with this statement however you have to take into cosideration that the 4.6 4v and 2v were basically brand new and no aftermarket help yet while the 350 has been around for a good 50+years