you certainly implied it. your silence otherwise speaks volumesI never said such a thing
you certainly implied it. your silence otherwise speaks volumesI never said such a thing
you certainly implied it. your silence otherwise speaks volumes
LOL at all the police threads in this site.
I am sure everything is exactly the way it is being told and there is nothing else to it to any story.
I am talking about what happened in the court room, why the judge did what she did.
About the elbow to that dude, it looked like the officers and the prisoner had some issues long before the video. Looked personal at that time.
this is what I was referring to.
How would I know? All I am saying is, things arent as media tells them they are. There is more to what happened in the court room than we know.
That doesn't excuse the judge from ignoring viable proof that the officer did wrong.
Imagine if someone stole your Cobra, you had clear video of it, and the judge ignored it, and let the shitbag go? I bet you'd burn the courthouse to the ground.
Judges preclude/"ignore" evidence all the time. That does not mean they are corrupt. If you have spoken to the court and asked it why the evidence was not allowed, please provide that quote.
Once the suspect is in custody (restrained), his safety is the sole responsibility of the arresting officer and organization. IF THE CUFFS ARE ON TOO TIGHT, we can be charged with countless charges.I'm going to have to jump in on this one and ask, looking at the scenario of the video, what would make it legally right to hit a restrained perp who looked like he wasn't struggling? He could make a bomb threat or a threat to kill that cop's family but it still wouldn't justify the cop hitting him. Just sayin'.
The judge and cop are incorrect in this... Even if the man spit, retaliation is NOT permitted. Punishment is NOT a Law Enforcement Officers duty...
What if the suspect were a registered sex offender (indecent liberties with a minor) and he mouthed to cop about getting a hold of his underage daughter? How many of you would be justifying the action now, even though legally not a thing has changed concerning that officer's right to be physical?
I agree that what the cop did was wrong, point blank. No excuses, no exceptions. I feel he should be fired and never work in law enforcement (or any position of authority) again, but I know how some of you are anti-LEO no matter what the circumstances are and will look for any way to put LEOs out of work.
A cop that lets words get under his skin shouldn't be on the force.