just dont buy monster stuff its nothing but overpriced stuff that looks fancy. It does nothing picture wise or anything. I work with TV's everyday and everything I have seen from the company is nothing special.
do you have a link to that? sounds interesting!maybe you go read some reviews where they did a test a coat hanger vs monster cables and no one could tell the difference it was kinda surprising
do you have a link to that? sounds interesting!
LOL @ $230 cables! wow!
All I know is I could generate noise when I had my APC surge protector that would make it to my stereo speakers, with he Monster I cannot. I say get a decent one.
http://consumerist.com/362926/do-coat-hangers-sound-as-good-monster-cables
he is the one for audio cables
ill find the one for video cables when i get some more free time at work
1080i and 1080p have alot of similarities both are the same resolution what makes you think a special cable is going to mak the difference on a digital signal? its not.... unless there is like 30db of attenuation witch would be like having a broken wire its impossible
i have cheap dvi cables for my computer i built it displays 2600* 1900 on my friends 26" monitor if i had a fancy cable it will make it better :lol: explain that please
thats because you had a busted shield on the wire you where using or a lose ground inside the unit
its just a 60hz hum from your ac
ya i really dont feel like proving you wrong
picture quality is not resolution. is the makeup of contrast ratio+ color ect.. with give you a better picture progressive can handle alot more info then interlaced resolution is irrelevant to an extent
just a waste of bandwith
dvi and hdmi are very close hdmi is the standard now because you only need 1 cable to carry audio with video vs running 2 cables with dvi
and the monitor support 2600 line alot more then 1900 by 1080P looks better then our sony xbr smart guy
Well I did a lot of research and ended up getting the HTS 2600 MKII. I didn't get it because it "cleans up the noise" I got it for the surge protecting ability. You you can see from this thread that a lot of people are either for it or say go with something cheaper. For me it came down to a piece of mind, here in Fl there are a lot of lighting storms. So for that reason I went with the one I did.....
^^^you're correct about contrast ratio.
yet another victim of marketing. oh well, you can't save 'em all i guess.
I am not saying that I disagree with what you are saying. But after all the research I have done, I have found just as many people that say these things work better, as the other people say they are a scam. With all the threads I have seen I have yet to see any proof. I have owned the $10-$30 surge's down here in FL and I have had a couple let me down. This is the first time I have ever bought one of these, so I guess I will find out how well it works.
While I wouldn't necessarily buy a $10 protector, I wouldn't have bought the Monster one either. .
That's how companies like Monster and Bose make a living. I mean, if you're paying $250 for a surge protector it MUST be better than the competition, right....RIGHT?
Honestly guys, think about it. Just because it's more expensive doesn't mean it does the job better. It's all a marketing ploy. Don't believe me if you don't want to.
And to the guy bragging that he only paid $60 for HDMI cables, I laugh in your face.
All HDMI cables are required to support, at minimum, a standard HDTV video signal (i.e. 720p or 1080i) by virtue of being tested to verify that they meet the HDMI spec requirements. This is referred to as a Category 1 test. More recently, the HDMI Authorized Testing Centers (ATCs) have added equipment to be able to test the cable’s ability to support 1080p (which is 2x the 720p/1080i video rates) and higher rates up to the maximum HDMI speeds. These higher speeds are called Category 2. Since 1080p and deep color are becoming more common market requirements, we are seeing cable manufacturers wanting to have their cables verified with this Category 2 high speed test instead of the Category 1 test so that they can market their cables as being 1080p verified. Simplay Labs is another HDMI testing service that has been performing this high speed cable test for over a year, and some cable makers are putting the Simplay HD logo on their HDMI cables as a way to convey this level of quality.
When purchasing HDMI cables, all you need to verify is that they are either Category 1 or 2 certified. Any other marketing schemes are pure bull. Bluejeanscable.com is one of the best, and most inexpensive sources on the web to buy cables. Folks, HDMI is a digital signal, either it works, or it doesn't.
Well I did a lot of research and ended up getting the HTS 2600 MKII. I didn't get it because it "cleans up the noise" I got it for the surge protecting ability. You you can see from this thread that a lot of people are either for it or say go with something cheaper. For me it came down to a piece of mind, here in Fl there are a lot of lighting storms. So for that reason I went with the one I did.....