New GenII Whipple Numbers

PWORLDSTANG

Bring 'Em Out
Established Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2006
Messages
3,540
Location
Pittsburg, CA (Bay Area)
There still hasn’t been much info put out there about the Gen II Whipple blowers, so I figured I’d contribute further and share my numbers and thoughts with everyone.

I originally bought the blower back in February, but held off on installing it and getting it tuned to finish up on some other mods first. I was finally able to have time to get the car tuned a little over a month ago.


My power adding mods are:

Gen II Whipple 2.3L @ 17lbs. (3.25” pulley)
JLT High Boost CAI (Unmodified)
BilletFlow TB
Mac Long Tubes
Mac O/R H
Flowmaster Cat Back

I threw on the 17lb. 3.25’’ pulley and went with that. I didn’t have time on the way to stop and get any higher octane in the tank, so on 91 pump the car put out 568RWHP/523RWTQ, with just 16 degrees of timing. Pull after pull, the car continued to make more power all the way down to the last pull in which it made the most power (568RWHP).


I am very happy with the numbers! Across the rest of the country, some may feel that 568RWHP isn’t much on 17lbs. But considering how limited we are only having 91 octane at the pump, I think the numbers are up to par.

DynoGraphPic.jpg


I was honestly surprised with the numbers. I expected them to be lower. There was fear the car was making more boost than 17lbs on the low octane I had in, so I got in and watched the boost gauge during a pull. It pegged at exactly 17lbs through my long tubes – which was also surprising.

There were no “dyno tricks” (ice on blower or fan during runs) or anything used to ‘inflate’ the numbers. These were straight SAE corrected numbers, with admittedly good weather for a July (CA) summer afternoon at 80 degrees.

I also got a separate 20 degree timing 94 octane tune. I will be running this 94 octane tune 100% of the time since my car is not a DD. As mentioned, I didn’t have time to locate a place to find any race gas to mix in the day of the tune, so I couldn’t get any accurate numbers with the 94 octane tune.

I did end up going to a different dyno to get some numbers on the 20 degree tune, but the dyno operator let off early on the runs in fear of the car going lean. You can see that in the second picture below. The blue line is the pump gas tune, and the red is the 94 octane tune. It looks like he let out at about 6200ish on the pump gas tune, and 5900ish on the 94 octane tune. There was no torque reading at all during that dyno day, as shown in the picture as well. I’m confident the car has a little more power than what is graphed in the second picture, but it doesn’t matter much to me – the car is fast as ****!

DynoSheetPic.jpg


For those of you who don’t have a Twin Screw, or have never been in a Cobra with one, the best way I can describe the feeling is as the RPM’s increase, so does your heart rate. It’s just sheer brutal power. With the Eaton, the car had the infamous “neck-snapping” low end torque that made the car fun and got your adrenaline rushing. IMO, the Whipple doesn’t feel anything like the Eaton. The feeling is more of a “body pinned-to-seat, gut wrenching” type of feeling than it is just “neck-snapping”. It still hits hard down low, but it just pulls unbelievably hard in the upper RPM range - all the way to redline. That’s definitely where it really shines at. As you can see from the dyno sheet, the car easily revs to 7K, and I can take advantage of the extra RPM due to the obvious much better efficiency over the Eaton.

HUGE thanks to my tuner Shaun@AED for tuning the shit out of this thing, and for all the help with the minor issues I’ve run across trying to make time to get the car on the dyno. The car runs better than stock, and much better than any other combinations I’ve had with the car thus far (can’t ask for anything better than that!). AED has always treated my car like it was one of their own, and has always had my back when I’ve had issues with the car that needed to be addressed. It’s good to have an honest shop that has great work in the area. Hats off to those guys.

:beer:
 
Last edited:

arodsvt

C Quema
Established Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2007
Messages
1,269
Location
in da ghetto
:eek:
There still hasn’t been much info put out there about the Gen II Whipple blowers, so I figured I’d contribute further and share my numbers and thoughts with everyone.

I originally bought the blower back in February, but held off on installing it and getting it tuned to finish up on some other mods first. I was finally able to have time to get the car tuned a little over a month ago.


My power adding mods are:

Gen II Whipple 2.3L @ 17lbs. (3.25” pulley)
JLT High Boost CAI (Unmodified)
BilletFlow TB
Mac Long Tubes
Mac O/R H
Flowmaster Cat Back

I threw on the 17lb. 3.25’’ pulley and went with that. I didn’t have time on the way to stop and get any higher octane in the tank, so on 91 pump the car put out 568RWHP/523RWTQ, with just 16 degrees of timing. Pull after pull, the car continued to make more power all the way down to the last pull in which it made the most power (568RWHP).


I am very happy with the numbers! Across the rest of the country, some may feel that 568RWHP isn’t much on 17lbs. But considering how limited we are only having 91 octane at the pump, I think the numbers are up to par.

DynoGraphPic.jpg
[/IMG]

I was honestly surprised with the numbers. I expected them to be lower. There was fear the car was making more boost than 17lbs on the low octane I had in, so I got in and watched the boost gauge during a pull. It pegged at exactly 17lbs through my long tubes – which was also surprising.

There were no “dyno tricks” (ice on blower or fan during runs) or anything used to ‘inflate’ the numbers. These were straight SAE corrected numbers, with admittedly good weather for a July (CA) summer afternoon at 80 degrees.

I also got a separate 20 degree timing 94 octane tune. I will be running this 94 octane tune 100% of the time since my car is not a DD. As mentioned, I didn’t have time to locate a place to find any race gas to mix in the day of the tune, so I couldn’t get any accurate numbers with the 94 octane tune.

I did end up going to a different dyno to get some numbers on the 20 degree tune, but the dyno operator let off early on the runs in fear of the car going lean. You can see that in the second picture below. The blue line is the pump gas tune, and the red is the 94 octane tune. It looks like he let out at about 6200ish on the pump gas tune, and 5900ish on the 94 octane tune. There was no torque reading at all during that dyno day, as shown in the picture as well. I’m confident the car has a little more power than what is graphed in the second picture, but it doesn’t matter much to me – the car is fast as ****!

DynoSheetPic.jpg
[/IMG]

For those of you who don’t have a Twin Screw, or have never been in a Cobra with one, the best way I can describe the feeling is as the RPM’s increase, so does your heart rate. It’s just sheer brutal power. With the Eaton, the car had the infamous “neck-snapping” low end torque that made the car fun and got your adrenaline rushing. IMO, the Whipple doesn’t feel anything like the Eaton. The feeling is more of a “body pinned-to-seat, gut wrenching” type of feeling than it is just “neck-snapping”. It still hits hard down low, but it just pulls unbelievably hard in the upper RPM range - all the way to redline. That’s definitely where it really shines at. As you can see from the dyno sheet, the car easily revs to 7K, and I can take advantage of the extra RPM due to the obvious much better efficiency over the Eaton.

HUGE thanks to my tuner Shaun@AED for tuning the shit out of this thing, and for all the help with the minor issues I’ve run across trying to make time to get the car on the dyno. The car runs better than stock, and much better than any other combinations I’ve had with the car thus far (can’t ask for anything better than that!). AED has always treated my car like it was one of their own, and has always had my back when I’ve had issues with the car that needed to be addressed. It’s good to have an honest shop that has great work in the area. Hats off to those guys.

:beer:


#s look a lil low for 17lbs, or maybe im just wanting u to make more? They say 17lbs is the most u should go with 91octane, im running the same setup u are but i have gen1 whipple and im making 16lbs with the headers as long as u feel that ur car is running strong #'s are just #'s but if ur happy thats all that matters...................enjoy ur nipple oh i meant whipple.:eek:

this is 16lbs here:
http://i123.photobucket.com/albums/o289/GregRET/Gusgraph.jpg
 
Last edited:

Posi

Had a blast.
Established Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2006
Messages
16,580
Location
Kentucky
Seems like some good number considering the timing, boost, and 91 octane. It's what the SOTP feels like that matters most though.
 

SSSSIKH

I ♥ BOOST
Established Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2007
Messages
1,970
Location
The Bay Area
saw your other post first, so i posted there!!

but good explanation of your experience with the Whipple...and i cant for mine!
 

Venomous01

Building Boost
Established Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2006
Messages
5,519
Location
Some Place Sunny
Actually seems a bit low. Should be around 580-600. I was at 590rwhp with 1000 miles on my motor. Its definitely gotten faster post break in. That was on 91 octane and 17 degrees. You should see another 8-10 though if you raise it up a degree so that would take you to 578. Still seems low. Hmmmmmmmmmm
 

PistolWhip

Resident Man Dime
Established Member
Joined
May 17, 2005
Messages
6,021
Location
South Jersey
Dam and here I was thinking that my 3.10 pulley was going to be at 17#'s with my Gen II, guess it's a good thing I did go overkill on the fuel system.
The good thing is that I still have 93 readily available at almost all of my local fuel stations, so hopefully there won't be any need for addatives.

What kind of supporting mods have you done?
 

FAsnakes

الوزن الى القوة
Established Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2005
Messages
4,089
Location
SoCal
Numbers look good.. The point is no ice or fans used to inflate the numbers...
 

SVTkel

SVTKel
Established Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2005
Messages
3,829
Location
North
Nice and congrats. Your explanation of the Whipple is exactly how I have been explaining my experience. In a way it is a good thing as it improves my grip a bit down in the lower gears.
 

FlaSeaDude

Building a Perfect Beast
Established Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2005
Messages
2,281
Location
Fruit Cove, FL
Good write up and congrats for getting the Whipple installed! :beer:

I also plan on installing a Whipple 2.3 Gen II by the end of the year and hope to get it installed and tuned during the "cool" months (Dec - Feb) here. We have 93 octane readily available in Florida so I plan on going with either the 3.25 or 3.0 upper pulley and am shooting for 17 pounds of boost and 600 RWHP. That seems to be pretty much the "norm" from what I've been reading about on the boards for this setup.
 

younggun04

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Established Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2007
Messages
3,353
Location
Canada
My power adding mods are:

Gen II Whipple 2.3L @ 17lbs. (3.25” pulley)
JLT High Boost CAI (Unmodified)
BilletFlow TB
Mac Long Tubes
Mac O/R H
Flowmaster Cat Back



Is that what your boost gauge is saying or are you going off what the pulley should make for boost? I had a 3.25 on my car and was seeing 15#'s. I made 533/488 on a mustang dyno which is roughly 591/541 (11% Just a guess since many MD's read differently) and my peak boost on my tuners boost gauge was 15.8#'s with 16* of timing on 91 pump and a 11.6 A/F. On the street with the boost gauge in my car i never saw over 15#'s with the 3.25 pulley.

I am seeing 17#'s now with the 3.00 pulley.
 
Last edited:

Shaun@AED

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2005
Messages
2,253
Location
CA
2nd graph with the lean A/F was with the Wideband in the tailpipe....& a cat-back with a few sizable exhaust leaks.

A/F on the street was verified with a calibrated Wideband at 11.6:1. (Typical with our setup..... 12:1 on the dyno = ~3 to 4 tenths richer on the street/track).
 

PWORLDSTANG

Bring 'Em Out
Established Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2006
Messages
3,540
Location
Pittsburg, CA (Bay Area)
First dyno shows 12:1 AFR but the second shows 13:1, I sure hope the first one is right :eek:

i was looking at the same thing and those af numbers seem high for my taste, i wont go above 11.5 with af at wot.

As mentioned, on those pulls the wideband sensor was taken out of the tailpipe with a couple of exhaust leaks back there.

I was at the shop the following week getting A/F ratio verified. It read absolutely perfect on the street.

Is that what your boost gauge is saying or are you going off what the pulley should make for boost? I had a 3.25 on my car and was seeing 15#'s. I made 533/488 on a mustang dyno which is roughly 591/541 (11% Just a guess since many MD's read differently) and my peak boost on my tuners boost gauge was 15.8#'s with 16* of timing on 91 pump and a 11.6 A/F. On the street with the boost gauge in my car i never saw over 15#'s with the 3.25 pulley.

I am seeing 17#'s now with the 3.00 pulley.

17lbs. is what my boost gauge read. Thus far for me, the blower boosts what it is advertised to boost.
 

PWORLDSTANG

Bring 'Em Out
Established Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2006
Messages
3,540
Location
Pittsburg, CA (Bay Area)
To everyone else, thanks. The car is like a whole new car to drive. The Whipple is one of those mods you get and wish you had done it sooner. For looking to buy one in the future, you won't regret it.
 

03dsgsnake

New Member
Established Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2006
Messages
1,628
Location
hewitt new jersey
congrats

To everyone else, thanks. The car is like a whole new car to drive. The Whipple is one of those mods you get and wish you had done it sooner. For looking to buy one in the future, you won't regret it.

Congrats as i said on other forum! enjoy it and squeeze some more out of that bad boy just dont go over 20 and the efficiency just drops!:rockon:
 

Users who are viewing this thread



Top