I wholeheartedly could not disagree more. I was trained to only discharge my firearm when life is in imminent danger. The first death was vigilantism. The second death was murder of an unarmed person. How do you feel regarding those who complain about police shooting unarmed civilians? Is it ok for police to shoot unarmed people in the back? No? Then why is this ok?
I have to wonder (and I know this isn't in the US) would he have been charged if not LEO?
Gun was put away from the would-be robber. Their backs were turned and he essentially shot them as they were trying to get away with his motorcycle.
I'm thinking that's a tricky situation here in the states, but maybe I'm wrong?
I dont think youre wrongI have to wonder (and I know this isn't in the US) would he have been charged if not LEO?
Gun was put away from the would-be robber. Their backs were turned and he essentially shot them as they were trying to get away with his motorcycle.
I'm thinking that's a tricky situation here in the states, but maybe I'm wrong?
I have to wonder (and I know this isn't in the US) would he have been charged if not LEO?
Gun was put away from the would-be robber. Their backs were turned and he essentially shot them as they were trying to get away with his motorcycle.
I'm thinking that's a tricky situation here in the states, but maybe I'm wrong?
As soon as i saw the initial still image i knew it was brazil.
Criminals over there make our criminals look like rookies. Their cops put them down when need be and nobody bats an eye. Tons more in the favelas just waiting to do the same thing. The cops will kidnap and execute criminals or even in the streets. And people whine about our cops use of force lol.
Sent from my iPhone using svtperformance.com