VMP Tuning and DepWraith's '13

Crushinator

Active Member
Established Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2010
Messages
422
Location
PA
You've gotta be kidding? Almost 700 rwhp with just those mods. Damn it I should stuck with the '13 I had ordered and just bit the bullet on the monthly payment. I have to stop coming in this section for good...or at least til I have one.

Years ago I paid almost $20,000 to have my Z06 at 695 rwhp. You just did almost those same numbers for what, $1,000? In-freaken-credible!
 

Detroit Iron

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Premium Member
Joined
May 15, 2012
Messages
521
Location
Parts Unknown
Nice numbers, especially the torque number...that is absolutely insane!

This car is redefining bang for the buck. 700 rwhp / 700 rwtq for minimal modifications.
 

blackshelby

New Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2009
Messages
296
Location
nj
Pulley-think its 2.4
TB-Justin's recommendation.
MAF & CAI-Stock.
Life is good :)

At that power level I would think the MAF has to be maxed out.(out of range)
I do believe it is the same sensor /cai as used in 11 and 12 , those were basiclly done at 630-640rwhp
 

Chris!

Former Ford Dealer
Established Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2004
Messages
7,692
Location
Boston MA
At that power level I would think the MAF has to be maxed out.(out of range)
I do believe it is the same sensor /cai as used in 11 and 12 , those were basiclly done at 630-640rwhp

I believe it is not the same MAF as the 11/12.
 

Chris!

Former Ford Dealer
Established Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2004
Messages
7,692
Location
Boston MA
I feel like I read somewhere here that it is different. Not 100% sure on that. Someone that has had it apart I am sure can speak to it
 

DepWraith

Active Member
Established Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2009
Messages
887
Location
Pinellas Park, Fl
At that power level I would think the MAF has to be maxed out.(out of range)
I do believe it is the same sensor /cai as used in 11 and 12 , those were basiclly done at 630-640rwhp

Well, didn't touch the MAF or the CAI so either they changed them this year or the numbers you had for the old ones were wrong.
 

flyby763

Member
Established Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2008
Messages
669
Location
Jacksonville, FL
To quote Justin from a previous thread on the MAF:

"The maf is not an issue, they have renormalized the maf period to a higher range. Its possible to renormalize it even more to get additional range."
 

Users who are viewing this thread



Top