QuikGT said:BEN99GT-...btw putnam gained 22rwhp bc he changed the springs....stage 1 cams dont need a spring change....just a lil fyi for u....
Giving me an FYI. LMFAO. :lol: The cams gave the car the power, I would change the springs on a 100,000 mile engine when swapping to .545" lift cams too. If you're trying to hint the springs were weak, you'd be wrong, it was knocking off 12.40s @ 108-109 mph N/A before the cams and it's rwhp was still right on the mark for what it had done. BTW, several other lower mileage cars gained right around the same with VT Stage 1 N/As.
VT Stage 1 N/As and...*GASP*... stock heads and NO TUNE (24 rwhp):
http://forums.modulardepot.com/showthread.php?t=59784&highlight=cams+gains
Here is another, Vt Stage 2s, auto, stock heads w/o headers (23 rwhp):
http://forums.modulardepot.com/showthread.php?t=55239&highlight=cams+gains
Please feel free to admit you are wrong at any point.
im pretty confident i could still smoke whatever u have done to ur 4v whilst running so bad....
No, you would lose horribly running on 6, you may well lose at the full 448 assuming I ran you on motor. But I'm not going to stoop to claiming I would "smoke you" or "burn you on 6" because I realize your car probably pretty damn strong...at least on the interstate.
Quit trying to change the subject. Cams typically gain 20-30 rwhp in 2Vs with STOCK PI HEADS!
Your original quote:
QuikGT said:but with the addition of cams he probably gained no more than 15rwhp out of them (cams in a 2v dont make much power without better heads)
Feel free to admit you're wrong at any time.
Last edited: