New GT500 Limited to 180 MPH

dannydarko11

Yeah...no, I know
Established Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2010
Messages
744
Location
San Diego/IE
If you get the gt500, of any year, to 200mph in the standing mile, you don't give a shit about a factory speed limiter--your car has had some major mods. Remember, we're talking about a factory stock car here...

Agreed, we like excess--I just don't care about excess gearing or a speed limiter at 180mph. 180mph is excess. Give me the hp and torque. If lawyers, driveshafts, axles, tires, whatever keeps the speed limited to, a still ludacris, 180mph then I don't see the point in complaining.

@dannydarko11 glad you got the popcorn ready!!

I got you, fam!

tmnt-2012mikey-momentspopcorn-gif.gif


lol

#firstworldproblems in this thread

Chill-ren in Africa can only go 75-80 to stay away from the cheetahs smh

lol
 

2KBlackGT

The Man, Myth, The Legend
Established Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2005
Messages
9,636
Location
Arkansas

CV355

_
Established Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2016
Messages
3,272
Location
_
Arguing top speed is a waste of time.

My old supercharged '00 GT was an absolute monster on the street and had a top theoretical speed of 153, limited by gearing. My GT500 is 2xxmph capable, but I would be too afraid of body panels launching off to ever attempt such a stupid feat, even on an enclosed, legal environment.

Top speed is a somewhat useless metric. What does it tell you? The calculations required to relate power output and coefficient of air resistance are too complicated for any average Joe to pull relevant data. 1/4 mile trap speed tells you far more with far less involvement. It's still a "fuzzy" metric, but you can get relativistic figures based on known data much easier.

Top speed : Cars is about the same as Bullet Travel : Firearms.
At the end of the day, MOA and kinetic energy are more important to me than how far the damn bullet travels. And anyone who is testing out how far a bullet travels is probably going to get raided by the ATF at some point. :)
 

svtfocus2cobra

Opprimere, Velocitas, Violentia Operandi
Established Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2004
Messages
26,600
Location
Washington
Arguing top speed is a waste of time.

My old supercharged '00 GT was an absolute monster on the street and had a top theoretical speed of 153, limited by gearing. My GT500 is 2xxmph capable, but I would be too afraid of body panels launching off to ever attempt such a stupid feat, even on an enclosed, legal environment.

Top speed is a somewhat useless metric. What does it tell you? The calculations required to relate power output and coefficient of air resistance are too complicated for any average Joe to pull relevant data. 1/4 mile trap speed tells you far more with far less involvement. It's still a "fuzzy" metric, but you can get relativistic figures based on known data much easier.

Top speed : Cars is about the same as Bullet Travel : Firearms.
At the end of the day, MOA and kinetic energy are more important to me than how far the damn bullet travels. And anyone who is testing out how far a bullet travels is probably going to get raided by the ATF at some point. :)

So you're saying you are more interested in knowing how hard the new GT500 can impact a person... in say... a crowd of people?
 

Recon

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2016
Messages
3,487
Location
In the 427R
I'm not going to disagree, Im a drag racer too. However, there are places for 200+ mph runs. Bonneville, Texas Mile, and a few others. I pushed a bike (getting a car to 200mph is a lot harder, and more expensive) to 211 at the Maxton Mile before it was shut down. I will admit that I prefer the 1/4 over a mile. It is more fun in my opinion.

A lot of the Hayabusa's legacy was in the fact that it was a 200mph bike off the showroom floor. The same is said for many of our favorite four wheeled toys. Just look at the complaints surrounding the Demon. The car is capable of a 9.65 ET, but only two people have gotten it there, and that has the car enthusiast population in constant debate. We live in an age in which 200mph is attainable, even if we don't push the car to that limit. We like excess.

If you have 800hp, 200mph is in reach.

Sent from my [toilet] using the svtperformance.com mobile app

Back in the 80’s and 90’s pops and his buddies were hitting 160 on the straight at road Atlanta. It would be a site to see.


Pick your poison.
 

CV355

_
Established Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2016
Messages
3,272
Location
_
So you're saying you are more interested in knowing how hard the new GT500 can impact a person... in say... a crowd of people?

Only the most appropriate of performance metrics:

CVPHPP

Crowd victims per horsepower per pound.

20' starting distance.

It weights everything into consideration- tires, suspension, torque output, driver incompetence, body shape, hell even the crowd demographic comes into play. I bet Challenger of Freedom guy would have mowed down more Antifa lemmings had they not been composed of Tumblrinas weighing in at 300+lbs each.
 

01blckcobra

Active Member
Established Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2009
Messages
314
Location
Wisconsin
Try a original 66 at 147mph, let me know when you need toilet paper, it will be before 150.. 2020 180mph is tits. she'll stay planted. no butt pucker factor. Want to feel 200mph, take off the spoilers..
 

Coiled03

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2004
Messages
12,264
Location
IL
The calculations required to relate power output and coefficient of air resistance are too complicated for any average Joe to pull relevant data.

Actually, it's really not. A few simple coast down tests, and some acceleration data will do it just fine, if you know how to do an integral. I wrote an SAE paper on it. It wasn't 17 pages, but still....
 

08mojo

...
Established Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2012
Messages
2,681
Location
Atlanta, GA
...It's still a "fuzzy" metric, but you can get relativistic figures based on known data much easier.

did you just combine relatively realistic into one word? Typo or not, I love it!

Back in the 80’s and 90’s pops and his buddies were hitting 160 on the straight at road Atlanta. It would be a site to see.


Pick your poison.

That's flat out moving at Road Atlanta on the back straight! Although, in the 80s and 90s the back straight did not have the chicane...but that's still impressive. I was hitting low 130s in a stock 2014 gt.

track up to late 90s:

Road_Atlanta_track_map_until_1998.png


track now (turn 10 is the chicane):

1200px-Road_Atlanta_track_map.svg.png
 
Last edited:

CV355

_
Established Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2016
Messages
3,272
Location
_
Actually, it's really not. A few simple coast down tests, and some acceleration data will do it just fine, if you know how to do an integral. I wrote an SAE paper on it. It wasn't 17 pages, but still....

You and I, sure. Average Joe doesn't know what an integral is, and I'm willing to be most people would confuse it with "integer." Haha

There's a statistics term that I'm trying to remember, and can't... Basically easy intrinsic data vs confounding data by introducing too many factors. I forget the term.

did you just combine relatively realistic into one word? Typo or not, I love it!

It's a real word, but I sort of butchered the use of it. I like your interpretation better, so uh, yeah I made it up :)
 
Last edited:

Coiled03

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2004
Messages
12,264
Location
IL
did you just combine relatively realistic into one word? Typo or not, I love it! I'm going to sta


That's flat out moving at Road Atlanta on the back straight! Although, in the 80s and 90s the back straight did not have the chicane...but that's still impressive. I was hitting low 130s in a stock 2014 gt.

track up to late 90s:

View attachment 1558319

track now (turn 10 is the chicane):

View attachment 1558320

Road Atlanta has been dead to me since they removed gravity cavity.

RIP
 

CobraBob

Authorized Vendor
Established Member
Premium Member
Single Barrel Sirs
Joined
Nov 17, 2002
Messages
105,582
Location
Cheshire, CT
If I was in the market for a 2020 GT-500 (which I'm not), top speed would not even enter into my decision making process. Unless it was under 135, and that's only if I intended to visit the 1/4 mile. There are so many other more important things that would influence my decision to buy or not buy.

I believe the new GT-500 is going to be overall one hell of a car. One hell of a beast! Yeah, Ford has been slow in feeding us information about the GT-500, but in the end I believe the majority of Ford fans, and even some from the other side, will be thrilled with it. IMO a 180 mph limit is not going to ruin the party, except for a small minority who will nitpick things that really don't matter in the bigger picture. For them, they'll choose another car and hopefully will be happy with their choice.
 

BigPoppa

Hope you enjoy the show
Established Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2016
Messages
2,253
Location
Your mom
Actually, it's really not. A few simple coast down tests, and some acceleration data will do it just fine, if you know how to do an integral. I wrote an SAE paper on it. It wasn't 17 pages, but still....
Most people don't know how to find a differential, let alone integrate.

But, now we've opened up nerdly things....

I've been seriously thinking of putting together a white paper about the relationship of acceleration vs. total integrated area of the power curve. Should be about 17 pages when done.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread



Top