*not graphic in the visual sense, just subject matter* (no gore or kids)
Having watched this video and seeing the lies that were told, I am very troubled and embarrassed by the officers dereliction of duty.
I wanted to wait for more definitive evidence and give the officers the benefit of doubt in the meantime. While this video is only a part of the truth, it shows so much; and it isn't good.
The audio in the video is distorted. I can't help but wonder if it was purposefully altered. Hopefully, at some point the audio will be released.
I certainly have no interest in that.They removed the screams of the children.
I wanted to wait for more definitive evidence and give the officers the benefit of doubt in the meantime. While this video is only a part of the truth, it shows so much; and it isn't good.
Yet again, this clown, with no real experience, goes on some ridiculous tirade against our Uvalde boys in blue (our heros)… the good part starts at the 20 min mark.
Seriously? Glover’s resume is quite impressive (Green Beret and OGA Operator) with quite a bit of real-world combat under his belt - including similar scenarios as Uvalde where the team enters and assaults against an active threat.Doesnt this joker understand?!?! Taktix, yo!
He was being sarcastic man...Seriously? Glover’s resume is quite impressive (Green Beret and OGA Operator) with quite a bit of real-world combat under his belt - including similar scenarios as Uvalde where the team enters and assaults against an active threat.
The main part of his business is to train police, swat, and rapid response teams combat-based TTPs. All his other ventures (survival company, civilian firearms training, etc.) are all fairly new as I understand it.
He was being sarcastic man...
Likewise.”more definitive evidence”… “give the officers the benefit of the doubt”… Lmao.
Stop it bro.
This disgrace of a response has been obvious since pretty much the get-go…
Only clowns excused those cowards actions….
400 officers on scene. 400!! Against one teenager. this just gets better and better…
Sniper had him in his sights before he entered the school. No permission to take him out.
Sent from my iPhone using svtperformance.com
how much of a incompetent asshole sniper do you have to be, to have a bad guy with an AR taking shots at people and school property, to have him on your sights and not take the shot because “permission”?
Talk about gross negligence…
Does everyone in that PD reauest permission from the chief before they proceed to wipe their ass too???
Bingo, a citizen would be well within his legal rights to stop the threat so even without explicit "permission" the officer would/should know he can pull the trigger without fear of major legal repercussions.
A reasonable person would assume the incident commander would give the officers on scene the "green light" to stop the threat if given the opportunity.
Lastly, imagine that for some reason orders were given orders to hold fire and an officer disobeyed to stop the individual who was killing unarmed people on school property. In that case I doubt there is a jury in California or NY that would convict him and certainly not one in Texas.