TacticalKaos said:Because the turbo was on it's way and I wanted to do what I could while I had it. The stockers were pushed to the max as it was anyway.
Gotcha
TacticalKaos said:Because the turbo was on it's way and I wanted to do what I could while I had it. The stockers were pushed to the max as it was anyway.
TacticalKaos said:No, add aftermarket intercooler, injectors and a pump which is a big deal with the STis fuel system. It should have been a much larger percentage.
I have to agree with you because I raced one on the freeway in a setup race.We went from 50-160mph and it was not far back at all.My car was running a little slow as I had a grip of torco in it and was probably running 106 octane with a 91 tune,so I was way rich.Still that car can hang with a pullied cobra.It would eat a cobra with cai and exhaust.300bhp/ton said::bs: :bs: If that M6 was really an M6 and in the 507bhp mode.
No way in hell did your car pull 4+ cars (enough to pull infront of him) from 70-100mph run. Even the frigging Starship Enterprise couldn't do that in that time scale.
An M6 is capable of trapping over 115mph in the 1/4 mile and from a roll is probably even more deadly due to the sequential 7 speed gearbox.
To pull that kind of distance in what 3 seconds or so you'd need to be trapping 125mph+.
Again Nice kill, but its not that your car did so well against the M6 but some other reason.
olscool said:Funny how this posting turned out. Believe me, there is no way the Cobra will edge out the M6 at that kind of speed. I own a Cobra and an M3 and can tell you the Mustang can barely handle the M3 period. They RUN Hard in the triple digits no question.
If your Cobra is taking 6-10 SECONDS to go from 70-100mph there is something really wrong with it. And with that level of performance you'd be lucky to keep up with a 2.0 litre Focus.9746Cobra said:I don't know exactly how long we went at it. Didn't time it. It was "at least" six seconds and "up to" ten seconds.
Girth said:Man this thread is still going????? :lol:
Girth said:Man this thread is still going????? :lol:
Doesn't really matter because it won't be comparable. They have a sequential 7 speed gearbox, so drivetrain loss will show up differently, however such a transmission shifts faster than an auto (much much quicker than any human) and due to having 7 gears is also geared better.DisposableHero said:what do the m6's dyno at?
300bhp/ton said:Doesn't really matter because it won't be comparable. They have a sequential 7 speed gearbox, so drivetrain loss will show up differently, however such a transmission shifts faster than an auto (much much quicker than any human) and due to having 7 gears is also geared better.
300bhp/ton said:Remember drag Co simply states how slippery the shape is, but with frontal area it's totally meaning less.
I mean a nice sleek Ferrari F430 will have a better drag CO than a brick. Yet because the brick has a much smaller frontal area it will actually generate less drag.
dtheo said:Nice kill, I love it how everyone tries to downplay your win like saying "well, if the driver had shifted faster or if you started at a lower speed roll or if the moon lined up with each star in the galaxy he would have smoked you".........
It is what it is, you won, he lost, doesn't matter the freakin reason, all the BMW guys here rush to critsize....bunch of pansies. If the M6 would have won, then congrats to him, but this wasn't the case. Move on people.....