100 Octane tune.
100 Octane tune.
^^ 100 octane tune? that's it, no other mods?
I've seen numerous high altitude dyno charts and they always seem to have an overly generous SAE correction factor for forced induction motors and show numbers that are usually well above what would be accomplished at lower elevations with a typical 2 to 5% correction factor. I think it's because they are using the same correction factor for naturally aspirated motors and forced induction motors. The forced induction motors don't seem to suffer to the same degree as a naturally aspirated motor, so they usually show higher than average dyno numbers. This is especially true with a turbocharged motor.
David
Last edited:
Oh no no. lol. Sorry. I posted earlier with my mods, and that 100 octane tune dyno was the only "change" from the above one. Guess I should have been more clear.
2.4 UP
FRPP Monoblade
JLT Intake
Kurgan Tune
My mods are in my signature. The last 2 pulls are utilizing 100 octane fuel. 682hp was created using John Lund's 91 octane tune. 697hp was created using John Lund's 100 octane tune.
I installed the frpp cj throttle body and no tune and picked up 15hp. Now I'm at 605 hp 610 tq.
Good god these cars really respond to simple mods. I can't wait to dump some money into mine. Thanks for posting up your numbers gentlemen.
ABSOLUTELY Bone stock
FRPP Dual TB, 15% IW lower, JLT 127 CF Intake w/ blue filter, NGK plugs, AR 2" into 3.5" longtubes into 3.5" O/R H into SW cat-back and Lund mail order 93 tune
Just finished installing and will be on the Dyno once the tune is properly adjusted... ID 1300, NGK TR7's, 2.396 upper, Thump Tensioner, Metco Idler, Gates Blue belt, Competition Dual BAP and Spec P trim Clutch...
Which is basically a Revan Racing 800/800 kit except bigger headers/ mid pipe and a 15% lower instead of a 10%... Going to be disappointed if somehow under 800/800.... Since with my bigger lower and exhaust should be higher. We shall see.
Ideally wanting to be at 825rwhp with this setup (to be able to get fender wings that say 900 HP due to ~10.5% drive train loss which is what I personally had stock from factory ratings)
Time will tell
FRPP Dual TB, 15% IW lower, JLT 127 CF Intake w/ blue filter, NGK plugs, AR 2" into 3.5" longtubes into 3.5" O/R H into SW cat-back and Lund mail order 93 tune
Just finished installing and will be on the Dyno once the tune is properly adjusted... ID 1300, NGK TR7's, 2.396 upper, Thump Tensioner, Metco Idler, Gates Blue belt, Competition Dual BAP and Spec P trim Clutch...
Which is basically a Revan Racing 800/800 kit except bigger headers/ mid pipe and a 15% lower instead of a 10%... Going to be disappointed if somehow under 800/800.... Since with my bigger lower and exhaust should be higher. We shall see.
Ideally wanting to be at 825rwhp with this setup (to be able to get fender wings that say 900 HP due to ~10.5% drive train loss which is what I personally had stock from factory ratings)
Time will tell
Lots of great numbers! Thanks for sharing! :beer:
VMP STAGE 4 including VMP 67mm TB, 123mm JLT CAI, 2.40 pulley - VMP 93 Octane Tune (Sunoco Ultra), 4.10 Gears but with tall 305 MT DR's.
Results were : 623RWHP / 626RWTQ.
Needless to say I was quite disappointed in these results.
This was on a 20+ Year Mustang Race Shop dynonometer where I've pulled various cars since 1999 as did many of my fellow Ford car club members.
I never base lined my car.
Second dyno graph was a 2 weeks later. Feeling curious I added a JBA Catted X-Pipe ...DITCHED the VMP TUNE .
The Mustang Race shop mapped out & installed a custom shop tune. Smoother curve - higher #'s but still a bit disappointed.
Results were : 646RWHP / 656 RWTQ.
Some years ago my friend's '08 pulled 556rwhp at this shop with mods. A week before my 2nd dyno graph he was preparing for the track.
He had the shop install 1 size smaller pulley + 4.10 rear gears with the same 305 MT DR's. With the pulley and new gears he pulled 574RWHP (+18) and gained 31rwtq. So...I cannot point my finger at the 4.10's as a big factor in my dyno results.
Results were : 623RWHP / 626RWTQ.
Needless to say I was quite disappointed in these results.
This was on a 20+ Year Mustang Race Shop dynonometer where I've pulled various cars since 1999 as did many of my fellow Ford car club members.
I never base lined my car.
Second dyno graph was a 2 weeks later. Feeling curious I added a JBA Catted X-Pipe ...DITCHED the VMP TUNE .
The Mustang Race shop mapped out & installed a custom shop tune. Smoother curve - higher #'s but still a bit disappointed.
Results were : 646RWHP / 656 RWTQ.
Some years ago my friend's '08 pulled 556rwhp at this shop with mods. A week before my 2nd dyno graph he was preparing for the track.
He had the shop install 1 size smaller pulley + 4.10 rear gears with the same 305 MT DR's. With the pulley and new gears he pulled 574RWHP (+18) and gained 31rwtq. So...I cannot point my finger at the 4.10's as a big factor in my dyno results.
Attachments
Last edited:
My most current numbers on 91 pump gas, 683whp and 686wtq, VMP tuned
20141122_094100 by https://www.flickr.com/people/127355855@N05/
20141122_094100 by https://www.flickr.com/people/127355855@N05/
Mods in sig
My mods in signature. Having trouble uploading pic. I'll try again later. I went from 780rwtq and 742rwhp to 874rwtq and 827rwhp. Changed intake, added upper pulley, and running race gas now. Lund tuned, so I'm pretty confident it's not gonna blow. I'll be going E85 in February to lower temps and add piece of mind lol
TORQJNKY
Active Member
Mods:
* 2013 Shelby GT500 w/ built and balanced 5.8L Engine
* 2.9L Whipple with 2.70" upper and 15% lower pulley
* JLT Super Big Air 155mm Carbon Fiber intake
* FRPP Cobra Jet wide oval throttle body
* Slawko Racing ported OEM cylinder heads, ported OEM lower intake, competition valve job
* Diamond Racing Pistons (9.7:1)
* Cobra Jet Crank
* Manley Billet Pro Series I-Beam connecting rods
* Parallel bypass return style fuel system (3x 465 Walbro Fuel Pumps) with FORE fuel pump controller
* ID 1300 fuel injectors
* JDM Super Stock Camshafts (Degreed by L&M Engines) w/ PAC Racing valve springs
* Reiche 170* thermostat
* C&R Super Competition GT500 Heat Exchanger
* American Racing 2" Long Tube headers (ceramic coated) w/ off-road X-pipe and stock axle back
* E-85 fuel
* Tuned by Jon Lund
Great numbers, guys. Thanks for posting!
So are all these tunes from Lund mail order? I thought you always had to be on the dyno to get the best and more importantly, safest tune? Has there ever been any issues as I'm sure this voids the Ford warranty so I wouldn't want to blow my new car up by doing this.
Last edited:
I'm paying for 662hp and 631 ftlbs of torque, should I/we not get that off the show room floor? Stock, as I drive off??
If the power advertised by Ford is at the crank, then ok, but is it?? Do we lose that much power to the rear wheels??
Please explain.
If the power advertised by Ford is at the crank, then ok, but is it?? Do we lose that much power to the rear wheels??
Please explain.
Last edited:
Users who are viewing this thread
