jesus Dom you LET THEM THINK they're winning....
never played chess?
Im a terrible chess player brother.
Balls and strikes.. that's how I call em.
jesus Dom you LET THEM THINK they're winning....
never played chess?
I appreciate you standing up for meBlaming boogeymen is much easier than addressing the real problem of mental health which the democrats love to nurture.
Wokeness, CRT, decriminalized drug use and the destruction of traditional family values through Marxism is to blame.
Case in point about not knowing what they are talking about. You say best entry method as opposed to how to get in. You’re making a shit ton of assumptions there.And while they were discussing the best entry method, he was murdering the kids. The cops KNOW you go NOW with what you HAVE, they didn't.
Yes and no. In the context of you and MG debating I assume it necessary to establish qualification and prior knowledge between you two. To be honest I would say that you did state “just go in” at some point in this thread. I could be wrong on that though. To add, I knew you were prior service, but I can’t remember branch or anything else.Wait, bro…. Please tell me you aren’t referring to me as “the person not having a basic understanding of tactics” or the “just going in” guy???
Go make an SD thread instead of following me around with your bullshit.Be careful.. he's getting ready to tell you how many "weapons" he's held in a "war zone".
you don't qualify bro!
Lmao
Go make an SD thread instead of following me around with your bullshit.
Care to elaborate as to whom you are referring with this comment?
Sorry, this one too, please
Case in point about not knowing what they are talking about. You say best entry method as opposed to how to get in. You’re making a shit ton of assumptions there.
Yes and no. In the context of you and MG debating I assume it necessary to establish qualification and prior knowledge between you two. To be honest I would say that you did state “just go in” at some point in this thread. I could be wrong on that though. To add, I knew you were prior service, but I can’t remember branch or anything else.
Go make an SD thread instead of following me around with your bullshit.
One has nothing to do with the other, and it sounds like you kind of have a chip on your shoulder. I’m not going to defend anyone, as I was not there. But, give me the specifics of whatever you feel is a wrong and I’m sure I can have a civil discussion about it. I don’t know much, but I’ll try and keep up.But all the ass holes with a badge who make excuses for the ass holes rolling in like they are serving a high risk warrant at a bar because they owners had the audacity to open during TTTHHEEE PAANNNDDEEMMIIICCCC. All the while unable to even put a modicum of scrutiny to the phaggits at Uvalde are types who I am referring to.
The story has changed so much that you ARE making assumptions. I’m making an assumption here…as far as I know, doors in school are specifically designed to withstand forced entry. You don’t know size/shape/location of windows or material they are made of. Say there are 3 windows placed 6ft at the bottom that are 1’x1’ and made of ballistic glass…how tf are they supposed to do anything with that?No assumptions, they SAT in the hallway while a dumb **** with delusions of tactical grandeur fiddle fumble ****ed around trying to decide what to do, while the kids were murdered. There is either an exterior window or a door, it isn't rocket science. But, sadly for the kids, the first couple guys on scene didn't take the initiative. They waited, for orders, that never came until way too late for the kids.
Dude, it’s almost impossible to have a conversation about tactics if the person you’re talking to doesn’t have a basic understanding. You can’t make them understand and assuming statements like “I would have gone in” or “done something” are said with tactical knowledge can’t be done. Hence the questions about his knowledge/experience/training. I didn’t see them as condescending or gate keeping. Meanwhile, any attempt to discuss the situation in logic only is met with ridicule and name calling. I’m mean shit dude, people here actually think a 9-person SWAT team is on 24/7 standby in a 16k person town.
To your “just following orders” statement, get real man, we are not talking about soldiers and war crimes. You know damn well if you were command and control and one of your perimeter guys left their post to be a hero would be severely disciplined. And they wouldn’t have been able to do shit to begin with.
I am trying to stay out of this discussion, but I will just say this: a LEO’s sole responsibility during an active shooter is to STOP THE KILLING, period. Im not going to get into was it a barricade or hostage rescue. Tbh I haven’t read much into it. But if the bad guy is going pew pew, you stop him immediately, and no order can be given to stop you.
The story has changed so much that you ARE making assumptions. I’m making an assumption here…as far as I know, doors in school are specifically designed to withstand forced entry. You don’t know size/shape/location of windows or material they are made of. Say there are 3 windows placed 6ft at the bottom that are 1’x1’ and made of ballistic glass…how tf are they supposed to do anything with that?
This isn’t even a door designed to stop forced entry.
Case in point about not knowing what they are talking about. You say best entry method as opposed to how to get in. You’re making a shit ton of assumptions there.
Yes and no. In the context of you and MG debating I assume it necessary to establish qualification and prior knowledge between you two. To be honest I would say that you did state “just go in” at some point in this thread. I could be wrong on that though. To add, I knew you were prior service, but I can’t remember branch or anything else.
Go make an SD thread instead of following me around with your bullshit.
One has nothing to do with the other, and it sounds like you kind of have a chip on your shoulder. I’m not going to defend anyone, as I was not there. But, give me the specifics of whatever you feel is a wrong and I’m sure I can have a civil discussion about it. I don’t know much, but I’ll try and keep up.
Well, if you see the dudes that stacked up and breached Or the ones that took fire, Send them my best.
If you see the others that waited in the hallway (till the men arrived). Tell them to get ****ed and turn in their badges. ****ing pussies.
How did an 18 year old working part time at Wendy's afford $4000+ of rifles, ammunition and accessories?
I’m with you on ending it as quickly as possible. I’ve stated as such that if they could gain entry and the psycho is slaughtering kids, you go in regardless. We’re talking two different elements to this. The perimeter guys had a job to do. It isn’t always clear that there isn’t another shooter laying in wait outside the school and that must be considered. Going to the guys inside, I mean if they physically could not get into the room, wtf are they supposed to do? If they where just standing around and could gain access but chose not to and he was in there actively killing kids…then **** them so hard. But it isn’t as simple as that.Bull shit. It takes intestinal fortitude. Tactical knowledge makes you better suited for the job, absolutely. In this context, its not like they were dealing with ****in Patton over there. The only tactic that matters is the one that was understood by the parents, seemingly until BORTAC arrived. End the threat as quickly as possible with minimal (hopefully no) collateral damage. There is literally nothing else to an active shooter scenario. If collateral damage occurs, pray its you.
100% agree man. Given this and my last post: Thank you for your service.
Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
Absolutely man. Ive worked enough entry and perimeter to understand the face value of the situation. There is a lot of nuance..... But for the millionth time, the only wrong answer is to do nothing.I’m with you on ending it as quickly as possible. I’ve stated as such that if they could gain entry and the psycho is slaughtering kids, you go in regardless. We’re talking two different elements to this. The perimeter guys had a job to do. It isn’t always clear that there isn’t another shooter laying in wait outside the school and that must be considered. Going to the guys inside, I mean if they physically could not get into the room, wtf are they supposed to do? If they where just standing around and could gain access but chose not to and he was in there actively killing kids…then **** them so hard. But it isn’t as simple as that.
There is a difference between robots and free thinkers, in people of action and people who just act. It’s in all walks of life, but in events like this it’s on full display. It takes all kinds of people to make up a team, but some people should be on the sidelines and not starters in the game. I think that’s no more self evident than this topic.Lol yeah I've definitely heard the chip on my shoulder thing a time or two. Pardon me for being critical of those with public trust.
Do they not have some commonality? One was just following orders.... the other was.... Wait for it..... (and I'm sure they taught this in your states LEO certification)..... Following orders!
See the common denominator now?
Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
Yes and no. In the context of you and MG debating I assume it necessary to establish qualification and prior knowledge between you two. To be honest I would say that you did state “just go in” at some point in this thread. I could be wrong on that though. To add, I knew you were prior service, but I can’t remember branch or anything else.