^ Umm not stock coyote cars, cars with slicks yes... stock 5.0's NO.
Just picked mine up yesterday. It took right at a month from order to delivery. The 8 speed auto is awesome. Light years ahead of the pos MT-82 transmission that was in my 2012 GT. Different cars, but it's a nice ride don't plan on auto crossing it just cruising and the occasional trip down the drag strip. I'm 6'5" and it has a ton of room.
If the challenger was the size of the '13/'14 5.0s with the same weight it would be in the driveway right now.
Anyone have any solid 1/4 mile numbers with these cars? I wonder how well they would do with a tire swap alone.
I just hope they got the engineering down on those trans, I would imagine a 8 speed trans rebuild or upgrade down the road would be some coin.
I just hope they got the engineering down on those trans, I would imagine a 8 speed trans rebuild or upgrade down the road would be some coin.
Just picked mine up yesterday. It took right at a month from order to delivery. The 8 speed auto is awesome. Light years ahead of the pos MT-82 transmission that was in my 2012 GT. Different cars, but it's a nice ride don't plan on auto crossing it just cruising and the occasional trip down the drag strip. I'm 6'5" and it has a ton of room.
You're joking, right? Camaro isn't even a muscle car anymore. It lost that title when it started snapping halfshafts/spindles on hard launches IMO. They've even broken IRS parts just dumping the clutch at like 5-10 mph, on the street, on a summer tire. Weak $***, no offense. What i'm about to say might seem typical on a forum named "svtperformance," lol, but numbers are numbers.
I got my '13 GT premium w/ Brembo package & 3.73's for $33k, five grand less than a 1LE. Even stock, it's quicker than any stock SS on the street, quicker than some of the bolties SS's too. Mod for mod we all know the 5.0 will outflow the Ls3 so i'm not really concerned with that. I was thinking more in terms of basic weight reduction, aiming at the 3450 lb range (without stripping any interior except for the back seats) and the car is going to be much stiffer than a Boss, lowered at least 1-1.5 with a watts link & probably camber plates with 265's or 275's up front and 305's or 315's out back. 1LE won't have a chance in hell on a track.
I'd make the argument that the real value for money is what the engine and driveline can withstand from the factory and how light the car is in stock trim, which translates to how much lighter it could be. I think you'll find that, in most cases anyway, suspension/wheel/tire changes aren't going to be as expensive as engine and driveline parts.
That being said....a Scat Pack R/T should've been released a LONG time ago, like, as soon as the Challenger came out. People should've been able to buy a R/T with the 6.1 hemi for well under $40k. And the SRT8 should be lighter, it should have a lot more tire underneath it, and it should be a good 30-40 hp stronger than the Scat Pack.
Your response couldn't be further from common sense. What exactly would you call a 2door car with 430hp, brembos, recaros, forged 20x11 wheels, 6speed only? A station wagon??? Be realistic with your responses next time. I agree dollar for dollar the mustang is a much better car, no denying that, but the fact you don't see the camaro as a muscle car makes you lose credibility for word one.
P.s.. LS1 cars were blowing up ten bolts left and right. guess those weren't muscle cars either? Maybe 4door hybrids better describes them?
Those Challengers are definitely growing on me. The 2015 Mustang Gt is a disappointment IMO. Its slower than the 14 and the IRS is crap.....Ford just can't get it right...wheel hop city. The exterior is NOT better than the challenger...not even close. Sure the interior is very nice but, it ain't better than the challenger's IMO. I also wonder why ford bothered with the 2.3 ecoboost? Have you seen what the 2.7 Ecoboost does for a 5000 pond truck....Ford should have put that engine in the mustang...or the 3.5. I'm actually hoping the next Cobra has the goods.
I'd take a holdover or slightly used 2014 gt500 over either car.
Not trying to derail this thread but I wonder if they plan on making a Scat Pack Charger with the N/A 6.2
Well, he wasn't wrong when he was disagreeing that the Camaro was a better performer for the money. It really isn't. Base 1LE SS will run you over $40k these days too, I believe, and they are slower than the 2014s which costs thousands less.
Those Challengers are definitely growing on me. The 2015 Mustang Gt is a disappointment IMO. Its slower than the 14 and the IRS is crap.....Ford just can't get it right...wheel hop city. The exterior is NOT better than the challenger...not even close. Sure the interior is very nice but, it ain't better than the challenger's IMO. I also wonder why ford bothered with the 2.3 ecoboost? Have you seen what the 2.7 Ecoboost does for a 5000 pond truck....Ford should have put that engine in the mustang...or the 3.5. I'm actually hoping the next Cobra has the goods.
I'd take a holdover or slightly used 2014 gt500 over either car.
Nice looking ride... Perfect color too. What options did you get?