Those are all GPS recorded times and I believe C&D used MTs test result which was from a GPS.
I'd like to wait and see, but I agree it's a bottom 13 second car with a great driver in good conditions. The mags usually underrate a car, but the ETs they listed for the Camaro are above average, (unless you're in like -2000DA conditions), and the trap speed is faster than I've ever seen at an actual track.
I was just pointing out that your mid 13 time on most real tracks wasn't entirely accurate. And no, C&D certainly would not use MT performance numbers. They are competing publications.
Most of the mags use a GPS type data logger called a VBox, which is a VERY accurate tool.
The new GT should be faster, but I highly doubt it will "kill" the SS like some here think. That aggressive gearing and little 255's could make it plenty tricky putting the power down for the average driver.
Last edited: