I mean this with all due respect, but you cage defenders are loony. They absolutely serve a purpose, no doubt about it, when combined with other safety items such as a fixed racing seat, HANS device, etc. But someone please explain to me how a cage alone would have saved Jeff Hagaman from decapitation, having a hand cut off and his stomach exploded. Remember, you guys are arguing for JUST a cage in this instance, nothing else. And remember just how much more dangerous Jeff's car would have been with that cage the other 75% of the time it ISN'T on a race track.
Jeff knew full good and well about safety. Just look at his CTS-V for proof. And he absolutely did play Russian roulette on Saturday, but that doesn't take away the negligence of the event/promoters for putting such fast cars in such a horrible circumstance. I will say since I wasn't there I can't and won't speak to what drivers were offered to be able to do in terms of track inspection, but that should be a minimal requirement.
I think most people talking about a cage are also referring to all requisite safety equipment. Gotta love the internet, start off with "all due respect" and then follow it up with name calling. Guess what, people can have a different opinion than yours and not be "loony"